Want to run a Linux based machine, but which distro?

Discussion in 'Linux & BSD' started by Glaanieboy, Feb 25, 2004.

  1. Glaanieboy

    Glaanieboy Moderator

    Messages:
    2,626
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    OK, just for fun, I want to install Linux on my machine (on a separate harddisk while the Windows harddisk has been taken out, just to be sure). If I want a easy to understand distro, where both terminal and GUI configuration is easy, for webserving (Apache and PHP), database (MySQL) and a GUI (for webbrowsing if I need help), is Slackware a good choice? So far I only got experience with RedHat and Mandrake, but I gave up on it, because it was to difficult for me at the time.
    I don't want to use the distro as a desktop replacement (yet), but as long as configuring is easy etc. and with a clear structure (not that the config files are all located on different places) and with the points I said above, I am happy.
    Oh, and I rather not want to use FreeBSD, I have tried installing both 4.8 and 4.9, but both failed, because for some reason my monitor said the video was out of range when I booted up in the GUI.

    If you say I can google for help, you're right, but I trust your guys, and I know that some guys/girls have good experiences with Linux.

    Specs (if you need any):
    MSI-6309 with a Via chipset
    PentiumIII 800 Mhz
    256 MB
    20 GB
    LAN internet connected through a router
    Samsung 151s 15" TFT monitor @ 1024x768 @ 72 Hz
     
  2. falcone

    falcone WinFS Advocate :D

    Messages:
    50
    Location:
    Singapore
  3. Glaanieboy

    Glaanieboy Moderator

    Messages:
    2,626
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Hm, when I tried Mandrake, I found it quite good. But I have heard some very good things about slackware, so if there are some good recommendations for that, I will try it. Other recommendations may also be given of course :)
     
  4. falcone

    falcone WinFS Advocate :D

    Messages:
    50
    Location:
    Singapore
    hmm tried debian? fedora red hat is not too bad too...
     
  5. vern

    vern Dominus Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    1,571
    Location:
    Minnesota, USA
    Slackware config is mostly done through text files, and you won't get much GUI configuration. Unless I was to use Dropline Gnome on Slack, I'd go with Mandrake or Fedora. Debian could also be a choice. I'm on a Debian box right now. Once you get used to apt-get and the ghastly install process, it'll be a breeze running your box. apt-get is very very powerful.
     
  6. falcone

    falcone WinFS Advocate :D

    Messages:
    50
    Location:
    Singapore
    debian's installation is ghastly alright.. drove me nuts once lol... :p
     
  7. Glaanieboy

    Glaanieboy Moderator

    Messages:
    2,626
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Hmm, looks like it's going to be Mandrake after all. I am now downloading Mandrake 9.2, I'll let you know if I have any more questions.
     
  8. dreamliner77

    dreamliner77 The Analog Kid

    Messages:
    4,702
    Location:
    Red Sox Nation
    Anyone have any opinions of Java Desktop Environment? I just got a free copy of it (legal).
     
  9. Reg

    Reg eXperienced!

    Messages:
    639
    Location:
    Arlington, TX
    I've had my share of SunOS and JDE. Never cared for either GUI interfaces. The backend (shell) is pretty good.
     
  10. falcone

    falcone WinFS Advocate :D

    Messages:
    50
    Location:
    Singapore
    whats SunOS and JDE?

    EDIT : does SunOS happen to have anything to do with Solaris? :confused:
     
  11. Reg

    Reg eXperienced!

    Messages:
    639
    Location:
    Arlington, TX
    SunOS is what they call Solaris now.

    JDE = Java Desktop Environment.
     
  12. falcone

    falcone WinFS Advocate :D

    Messages:
    50
    Location:
    Singapore
    okay.. so JDE is??? actually, i tink it is a java-based desktop right? but wouldn't that be extraordinarily slow? i mean the java runtimes on windows is really sluggish..
     
  13. Reg

    Reg eXperienced!

    Messages:
    639
    Location:
    Arlington, TX
    Not really. JRE's are slow in Windows because it has to:

    1. Launch the JRE virtual machine program (like running an OS in an OS)

    Then

    2. Launch the App

    Since the OS is Java, you don't have to worry about the A part so it essentially will run just like any other OS.

    Example:

    Windows runs great on the PC hardware
    Mac OS X runs great on the PowerPC hardware

    Yet, when you run Windows on a Mac using VirtualPC, windows runs slower than a snail! Why? Because PC hardware has to be emulated, memory has to be allocated, and processing power has to be shared. The same would be true if you could run Mac OS X virtually on a PC.
     
  14. Xie

    Xie - geek - Subscribed User Folding Team

    Messages:
    5,275
    Location:
    NY, USA
    isn't that new "java desktop" just linux running like kde modified w/ java apps?

    * Edit * - got off topic of the post :p ... I vote slackware ... if you wanna run X make sure you config it correctly before starting up your gui and you shouldn't get those nasty error msg's.

    *Edit #2 * - my bad based off gnome not kde :/ ...
    taken from suns own site here
     
  15. vern

    vern Dominus Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    1,571
    Location:
    Minnesota, USA
    But Windows and Mac programs are compiled to machine code while the Java I know is compiled into byte code which has to be interpreted by the JVM. Unless the OS only runs applications code compiled to a language the machine can understand without the need for a JVM, it'll always be slower.
     
  16. X-Istence

    X-Istence * Political User

    Messages:
    6,498
    Location:
    USA
    FreeBSD, forget Linux.
     
  17. NetRyder

    NetRyder Tech Junkie Folding Team

    Messages:
    13,256
    Location:
    New York City
    Haha, that's funny, considering the first post clearly indicated:
     
  18. Xie

    Xie - geek - Subscribed User Folding Team

    Messages:
    5,275
    Location:
    NY, USA
    but it sounds like it only "failed" because he need to tweak X some.
     
  19. NetRyder

    NetRyder Tech Junkie Folding Team

    Messages:
    13,256
    Location:
    New York City
    That's quite possible, but from what I understood of the original post, he wanted something that would work without much tweaking.
     
  20. Xie

    Xie - geek - Subscribed User Folding Team

    Messages:
    5,275
    Location:
    NY, USA
    He's done RH and Mandrake ... not sure he's gonna find a distro thats gonna be more GUI/server friendly "out of box" then them. :/