greggustin said:
will research raid 5
how is that different than raid 0+1?
also most new MB have raid 0, or 1, or 0+1
have not seend any with 5
and
is performance same if raid is built in - or via add-in card?
Raid 5 uses 3+ drives and stripes data + parity info across each drive. The parity information is useful to access data when (note I say "when" and not "if") a drive failes. In a RAID 5 scenario, when a drive fails, you can still access all data (although your performance will suffer). If 2 drives fail, however, you Screwed. RAID 5 is very fast for data reads, a little slower (compared to RAID 0) on the data write.
RAID 0+1 is a mirrored stripe set - requires at least 4 drives with each pair in a stripe set and one stripe set mirroring the other. No parity information is calcuated or written.
I won't get into RAID 1+0, but it is different (and better) than RAID 1+0 but most consumer boards don't really support it. Last time I checked (it has been a while since I built a custom system), most onboard RAID on the consumer side only support RAID 0, RAID 1, and RAID 0+1
3rd party RAID controller performance depends greatly on which controller you buy and the feature set on the controller. Buying a RAID controller with a larger cache can improve performance significantly depending on your disk usage. Buying a server class SCSI Raid controller large (battery backed) write caches can have a huge performance advantage.
Lots more info on RAID can be found on the web.. check
Wikipedia for a start.