Policy on iraq

Discussion in 'Green Room' started by Sazar, Feb 21, 2003.

  1. Sazar

    Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    14,905
    Location:
    Between Austin and Tampa
    just wondering what the general opinion on this board is on the events unfolding.. seen a few polls around the web so decided to put one up myself :)

    please keep comments concise/precise and to the point so as to avoid flame bait and trolls :)

    cheers...
     
  2. jonifen

    jonifen pffff...

    Messages:
    705
    exiled like this???

    [​IMG]

    :D
     
  3. Sazar

    Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    14,905
    Location:
    Between Austin and Tampa
    heh.... counter-strike has infiltrated popular culture :)
     
  4. Kr0m

    Kr0m Moderator

    Messages:
    1,390
    Location:
    Turtle Island
    I dont think there'd be much chance for exile. How many of his followers or how much of his government would support that?
    I fear that the only way to take power from him and his government is War. :confused:
     
  5. Nick M

    Nick M Moderator

    Messages:
    3,961
    Save Benny and Company, following that, destroy all of the middle east.
     
  6. jonifen

    jonifen pffff...

    Messages:
    705

    :eek:
     
  7. Jahya

    Jahya Guest

    The issue here is "weapons of mass destruction" right? That's what this soon to be war is all about. Well that and removing Sadam from power....

    But why? From a U.S. citizen's point of view, it seems a little stupid. As of now, the majority of the world hates us anyway for a whole variety of different reasons and these "weapons of mass destruction" are not even a direct threat to the U.S.. Even unchecked, Iraq is 10+ years from having capabilities to launch anything this far, unless of course the weapons inspectors are even more useless than they appear. So let Europe and the Middle East deal with it. They are the targets that are in range and for the most part they do not want us there to begin with (of course they want our money though --- infidel BAD, but infidel money GOOD). Besides that, I think we have more pressing matters a little bit closer to home. Like N. Korea.

    Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying we should attack N. Korea or even consider the possibility at the moment, but lately there's been a lot of bad blood between the U.S. and N. Korea. N. Korea is making it clear that they do have the capabilities to launch at least as far as the west coast of the U.S. and that "if provoked" they will.

    So, logically which is the more real threat right now? I would say N. Korea. GW did a hell of a job pissing them off with his "Axis of Evil" comment and I don't think they've ever gotten over it... especially since the term still comes up quite often. And now, it seems we are heading into the Phillipines full force. Oh, yes, we were already there as "advisors" but now we are preparing to commit assault forces to combat the Abu Sayyaf rebel movement. Let's not also forget we're still in Afghanistan and will be for awhile. And of course I am sure we are spread out in many other countries, some we know about, others we don't. And I almost forgot we're also fighting the "war on drugs" in Columbia, again using our military.

    Basically, we need to go into Iraq about as much as we need a bunch more "paradise ticket holders" blowing themselves up and crashing planes, boats, etc into U.S. intersts abroad and at home. Of course, the latter we will get anyway. It is inevitable. Of course, they will say that we have brought this on ourselves through our infidel ways and we will continue to blow **** up in retalliation and the vicious cycle will continue....

    So in summary, I didn't vote because I don't agree with any of the options listed, and I see the only way the U.S. should be involved in a strike against Iraq is with full U.N. backing. This will not happen anytime soon so long as France and Germany have a say in it.
     
  8. gonaads

    gonaads Beware the G-Man Political User Folding Team

    I think they (Iraq) should be left to themselves. They will self destruct on their own soon enough. If it wasn't for the U.S. funneling money into Iraq way back when, Saddam would have just dissapeared on his own. But now it's Saddam this and Saddam that. The U.S. and the Bush Sh!t administration should really be focused on the events in North Korea. Now THAT is a threat to the U.S. Not some two bit wanna be power hungry wacko that the U.S. helped put into power to begin with.

    Oooooh but Bush don't wanna even think about North Korea, that's toooo complicated for him. He wants the easy stuff. His foreign policy is so pathetic it's scary.
     
  9. Sazar

    Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    14,905
    Location:
    Between Austin and Tampa
    no offense but its MY poll and I dont think things should be ADDED to it :) specially without my approval...

    if there was something controversial you can edit... but just adding for the sake of adding... :) please kindly re-edit and remove it m8...
     
  10. gonaads

    gonaads Beware the G-Man Political User Folding Team

    Nag nag nag... Happy???

    I think it's an incomplete poll the way it is.
     
  11. Sazar

    Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    14,905
    Location:
    Between Austin and Tampa
    no doubt... but its not nice to edit peoples polls for the sake of including options you want... suggest and if there is consensus... go ahead and stick it in :)

    IMO I wanted to keep it linear.. 2 peace 2 war and the option to perhaps have one without either :)
     
  12. gonaads

    gonaads Beware the G-Man Political User Folding Team

    Yes, but that is tooo black and white. even with the one without the other. There is gray area also. But like you said it is YOUR poll. :blink: :cool:


    So enlighten us with your thoughts on this.

    Or are you just gonna sit back and watch?
     
  13. Sazar

    Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    14,905
    Location:
    Between Austin and Tampa
    I am all for peace :)

    prefer that saddam be put in exile so that no one really loses face (depends on how the iraqi pr will swing this.. but he could be portrayed as saving the country or whatever)

    no one gets hurt and the economy will keep chugging along at a better click than it is now :)

    @ this moment the way things are drawn up.. NOT doing anything is not an option... hence why I never put the option you put forward... it is not feasible...
     
  14. jonifen

    jonifen pffff...

    Messages:
    705
    looks like FW1 about to happen... (Forum War 1) :p
     
  15. gonaads

    gonaads Beware the G-Man Political User Folding Team

    Naaaaaa... it's all good. We all have opinions. :happy:
     
  16. Octopus

    Octopus Moderator

    Messages:
    1,200
    war on Iraq will yeild a holy war between the three religions.
     
  17. Nick M

    Nick M Moderator

    Messages:
    3,961
    No, it won't. Where is the founding for that statement?

    The war might as well start an anti-muslim feeling, especially if terrorists start numerous attacks on cities, but no one is going to say

    " All people Christian are going to war with all people Muslim "

    That's a bad statement Octopus.
     
  18. Tabula Rasa

    Tabula Rasa Stranger Than Kindness Political User

    Messages:
    3,233
    Location:
    Israel
    Is that old "war" thing still around? i mean its so 90's
     
  19. damnyank

    damnyank I WILL NOT FORGET 911

    Messages:
    2,359
    Location:
    Petal, Mississippi
    We should have got Sodamn Insane the first time!