Discussion in 'Green Room' started by Kush, Sep 7, 2004.
check out this video, dont know if its true or not.
That was quite interesting.
Quite interesting indeed.
Yes it is
But if you see another site you see what that person missed out then it makes it BS lol
they present a compelling argument...
wow thanks ~bk u bumped me up now i have two rep boxes THANKS!
''Here is an article with some of the quotes used in that flash presentation. They only give half the quotes and make it sound as if the eye witnesses are agreeing that this was not a commuter plane, which is not at all what they are implying when they discribe the attack.//
Makes ya think don't it. But a Missile is definately more to the way the damage to the Pentagon shows. Hmmmmm...
hmmmm great film
Now the Missile could have been the backup plan since one of the Aircraft never got to it's intended target.
I never take anything from ebaumsworld.com serious
But I have seen footage from that first day and it never looked like a plane had hit. Damage was too light. The media put it off as saying that the Pentagon was such a strong built building, made to withstand an hard impact... go fig.
An Airliner the size of a 757 would have taken out the whole section. Those planes are huge.
It does indeed look like a missile strike.
DOCUMENTARY: The 9/11 Conspiracies
Channel: Channel 4 4
Date: Thursday 9th September 2004
Time: 21:00 to 22:00 (starting in 1 day)
Duration: 1 hour.
Documentary which tries to unravel some of the most prominent conspiracy theories that have persisted ever since the terrorist attacks on the United States in September 2001. Among those interviewed are official investigators, various intelligence sources and some of the conspiracy theorists themselves as the programme attempts to discover who is peddling the stories and what truths may yet be hidden.
Excerpt taken from DigiGuide - the world's best TV guide available from http://www.digiguide.com. Copyright ©1999-2004 GipsyMedia Ltd. Information copied from DigiGuide cannot be re-distributed, sold or used without prior written consent from GipsyMedia Ltd. All rights reserved.
I would think that if there was such compelling evidence about this possible conspiracy/coverup with the Pentagon crash, that it would have long aired on a news channel rather than on Ebaumsworld.com -- "A Hilarious Collection of Media for the Masses."
Guys, this has been going around like crazy and it's bull****
First of all, if it was a missle, where did all the people on the plane go? Where did the plane's crew go?
For all we know those witnesses could have all been made up. And even if those people were real, I doubt they knew what a missle souded like.
Hmm.. interesting Grandmaster.
Another conspiracy theory down the drain
Damn! And I was just buying into that one!!!
Seriously, I heard this quite some time ago, and it sounded like a black helicopter story then, too. If you look at the footage of the planes hitting the towers, you'll see that there was very little damage done by the wings...actually, at 100+ tons, or whatever the weight of the aircraft was, there was very little impact damage period. Most of the structural damage was from the heat of the burning fuel, not from the impact. At the speeds the two aircraft that hit the tower were travelling, the wings were most likely precariously close to being torn of from exceeding max speed anyhow...so it justs makes sense that clipping light poles or hitting on the first bounce on the way into the Pentagon already weakened/snapped the wings. They would by law of physics continue to travel in the same general direction...and follow the fuselage into the inferno. Aircraft aluminum melts quite well. Go look at other plane crash photos..same story. No discernable plane left, just a burn mark. But I will admit, it a good conspiracy theory. To the untrained eye, it sure looks plausable.
Interseting that in the first link at the bottom of the page the pic on the right shows the impact hole. But even if the wings were to disintegrate into nothingness they would still show a large slice like impact in the outer stucture of the building. And it does not. Strange. And if you remember the impact holes in the side or the towers, they showed a very wide impact hole with the center being larger than where the aircraft's wings hit, So the pics are not consistant with an aircraft impact.
Now this does not look like an airliner impact
Look at the base of the building in the pic below, the base supports are still there. If the wings had hit there, there would not be anything left. Plus they said that the plane hit between the first and second floors. Still no wing impact damage. Very strange.
Now look at the width of the impact on the north tower.
Hell of a difference.
Plus the emense size of the impact hole in comparason to the Pentagon