Ok, I don't understand something, maybe someone can enlighten me. What the heck is up with the multiple scoring standards? In the mens all arround competition, all the competitors were judged out of an average starting at a 10.0 on the rings, except Bret McClure his max possible score according to the judges was only a 9.5! Why is that? Shouldn't everyone be judged on the same score shouldn't they be? Otherwise what is the point?