old Futuremark 3DMark03 Benchmarks

Discussion in 'Benchmarks & Performance' started by leencaci, Jan 5, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. leencaci

    leencaci Guest

    Is a score of 6436 good on 3dmark03? I just upgraded my video card to the Radeon 9800XT 256MB. My processor is a P4 3.0HT. I am not that familiar with the range of scores that are associated with 3dmark03

    Thanks
    leencaci
     
  2. Electronic Punk

    Electronic Punk Administrator Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    18,590
    Location:
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    We have a section dedicated to this.
    And yeah it seems about right.

    Got a compare URL? Also observer the format of Sazar's stickied threads.
     
  3. Sazar

    Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    14,905
    Location:
    Between Austin and Tampa
    I am going to go ahead and close this thread :)

    post any benchmark results here and please read the guidelines posted...

    I just got back from my little vacation and am going to clean it up a little bit :)
     
  4. Electronic Punk

    Electronic Punk Administrator Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    18,590
    Location:
    Copenhagen, Denmark
  5. LeeJend

    LeeJend Moderator

    Messages:
    5,291
    Location:
    Fort Worth, TX
    the_music_man likes this.
  6. Alucard

    Alucard Let the show begin...

    Messages:
    30
    Location:
    Greece
    3DMark Score 5980 3DMarks
    CPU Score 640 CPUMarks

    P4 2.8ghz 800mhz FSB
    GeforceFX 5900U 256MB at stock speeds using 53.04 Forceware
    512 MB DDR PC3200

    Well i was scoring around 5200 3DMarks with 52.16 Forceware and when installed 53.03 my score suddenly jumped up to 5980! Looks like Nvidia is cheating again...
     
  7. RagnaroK

    RagnaroK Must be dreaming...

    Messages:
    673
    Location:
    Australia
    3DMark Score 153 3DMarks
    CPU Score Not enough CPU tests run

    That's what I get for having the free version of 3DMark and for having a GeForce 2. lol :D
     
  8. Sazar

    Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    14,905
    Location:
    Between Austin and Tampa
    3dmark score 5260
    cou score : 778

    highly gpu dependent... cpu makes hardly any difference to score :)

    same rig as in my sig..

    win xp pro
    msi k8t800
    1gig corsair xms ddr3200
    radeon 9700pro AIW
    athlon64 3400+

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1972952
     
    the_music_man likes this.
  9. LeeJend

    LeeJend Moderator

    Messages:
    5,291
    Location:
    Fort Worth, TX
    What was the score off the old P4 system?

    Wait until the 64 bit OS and optimised code comes out. I'm guessing it will be worth about 20-40% on the score.
     
  10. Sazar

    Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    14,905
    Location:
    Between Austin and Tampa
    the 3dmark03 test is based on the gpu... I can increase it by oc'ing... not so much more by raw cpu power alone.. it only went up a little over the previous system as opposed to the 3dmark2001 score...

    :) the o/s will unlikely make much difference but we shall see...
     
  11. Sazar

    Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    14,905
    Location:
    Between Austin and Tampa
    3dmark score 5526
    cou score : 777

    same rig as in my sig..

    win xp pro
    msi k8t800
    1gig corsair xms ddr3200
    radeon 9700pro AIW
    athlon64 3400+

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1984043

    re-ran test with default cas 2 settings and whoa... decent jump..

    dunno why the gfx card is showing oc'd though... I never changed any video card settings :confused:
     
  12. LeeJend

    LeeJend Moderator

    Messages:
    5,291
    Location:
    Fort Worth, TX
    Installed and Benchmarked Omega 4.1 update. Aside from 3dMark2001 which was probably a benchmark quirk the results were unchanged within normal test variations.

    3DMark 03 Same results as the ATI 4.1
    Aquamark Benchmarked ~1% slower
    3dMark 2001 Benchmarked ~10% slower overall but most of hit was in a couple tests.

    I can post the details if anyone is really interested.

    Objectively:
    In games the contrast seemed to be set higher which produced more striking detail but washed out highlights (bright spots). The nature in mark2001 seemed to be washed out also. I'll see how it plays in BF1942 tonite.
     
  13. Taurus

    Taurus hardware monkey

    Messages:
    3,206
    Location:
    Sacramento, CA
    WinXP Home SP1
    Athlon XP 2500+ Barton @ 10.5x200 = 2.1GHz
    Abit NF7 2.0 (forceware 3.13)
    2x512MB cheap PC3200 @ 400MHz, 7-3-3-2.5
    ATI Radeon 9800PRO 128MB @ stock (cat 4.2's)

    5770 3dmarks
    577.0 cpumarks
    (coincidence :confused: )
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2057077

    have yet to tweak memory timings and OC radeon.
     
  14. coathanger007

    coathanger007 Tomorrow Tweaking Today

    Messages:
    1,520
    Location:
    Australia
  15. Sazar

    Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    14,905
    Location:
    Between Austin and Tampa
  16. LeeJend

    LeeJend Moderator

    Messages:
    5,291
    Location:
    Fort Worth, TX
    Barton 2600
    ECS NF2 Ultra 400
    512 of 333@ CL3.0 Note - Dual DDR was not enabled.

    3DMark Score 3642 3DMarks Not much cnahenge fromt he XP2000
    CPU Score 489.0 CPUMarks 50% Speed increase over the XP2000


    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2142890
     
  17. LeeJend

    LeeJend Moderator

    Messages:
    5,291
    Location:
    Fort Worth, TX
    Got the upgrade sorted out. Here are the new numbers:

    Windows xp
    Barton 2600, FSB 333 ECS NF2 Ultra 400
    768 of 333@ CL2.5 Dual DDR was enabled.

    3DMark 3693 about 5% faster than the xp2000
    CPU 470 about 50% faster than the xp2000

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2169677
     
  18. VenomXt

    VenomXt Blame me for the RAZR's Folding Team

    Messages:
    3,453
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    3dmark 03: 4560

    AthlonXP2400
    Crucial XTM Pc2700 1 gig (2 512 sticks)
    (9700 Pro Ati)
    WIN XP PRO
    ASUS A7v8x

    does this seem low to anyone else?
     
  19. Petros

    Petros Thief IV

    Messages:
    3,038
    Location:
    Pacific Northwest
    That seems about right, actually. A new (2800+ or better) processor will bring you closer to the 5000-5500 range. It's your bottleneck at the moment.

    -edit- I'll be posting the scores with my new 9800 Pro soon...so excited :eek::eek:
     
  20. Sazar

    Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    14,905
    Location:
    Between Austin and Tampa
    nah... doesn't seem low... depends on your settings.. this benchmark is GPU limited so even if you got a supercomputer and plugged your card into it you will not likely go up in score very much... your cpu score on the other hand would go up a lot...

    please provide a compare link just like everyone else has..
    thank you :)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.