nvidia or omega??

Discussion in 'Graphics Cards' started by Bretenn, Aug 5, 2002.

  1. Bretenn

    Bretenn Guest

    what do u guys recommend for gf4 mx...... omega driver or nvidia driver??
     
  2. Iceman

    Iceman Moderator

    Messages:
    2,695
    just depends, the omega drivers look better, but are slower.
    the Nvidia drives are faster, but don't look as good.

    toss up

    [​IMG]
     
  3. Bretenn

    Bretenn Guest

    i think the new omega v1.0.8 realli doesnt fit me.... 3dmark 2001se score is 38++........ while using nvidia v29.42, i get 6+++ and even the omega v1.0.4.2c i still manage to get 59++....
     
  4. RA|N

    RA|N Guest

    The nvidia drivers are configured for benchmarks, so with ATI's drivers, don't forget they are in war, i use omega for my radeon 8500, the omega are configured for visual perfomance(good for games) but the original ATI are for benchmark, i recommend omega if you want perfomance..
     
  5. Bretenn

    Bretenn Guest

    i dont think it is abut performance... it is about quality.... texture quality that really kick nvidia away.....

    btw... i manage to fix the prob for my benchmark..... and now manage to get 60++... (sory to blame oemga.... it is the stupidity of me :)) Now using omega v1.0.8.0........
     
  6. Bretenn

    Bretenn Guest

    i know... but i just like to feel the real texture out there..... (but need to lower the resolution tho)........
     
  7. Bretenn

    Bretenn Guest

    btw... i think probably this week i will get myself a swiftech 462A cpu cooler. hope it realli cool my stupid com down a bit lo.... :)