My take on it so far --
Image quality is probably the best of any software decoder I've seen. My real issue seems to be whenever I try playing NTSC interlaced video at odd refresh rates. My normal rate is 72 Hz (which I use for a 1:1 display of 24-frame progressive DVDs). When I play 60 Hz interlaced content, it apparently just dumps every twelfth or so frame -- and as a result you get fairly choppy video. You expect some sort of pseudo-inverse-telecine from just about any video application, but it's conveniently left out of NvDVD. I thought DXVA controlled video sync anyway, but I guess I was wrong.
Sound quality is average. I still prefer PowerDVD's audio engine, especially for its (optional) DTS and Pro Logic II support and stellar downmixing options.
Surprisingly, it's only slightly more CPU-intensive than most decoders. However, it's not very graceful under heavy system load; instead of dropping frames it simply freezes, loses synch for a while, then steadily attempts to catch up once resources become available.
All I can personally say about it is that it has potential, but it won't be replacing the other decoders in my system anytime soon. It feels like a beta in many respects, and considering they're about to ship to OEMs, that's not a good sign.
Image quality is probably the best of any software decoder I've seen. My real issue seems to be whenever I try playing NTSC interlaced video at odd refresh rates. My normal rate is 72 Hz (which I use for a 1:1 display of 24-frame progressive DVDs). When I play 60 Hz interlaced content, it apparently just dumps every twelfth or so frame -- and as a result you get fairly choppy video. You expect some sort of pseudo-inverse-telecine from just about any video application, but it's conveniently left out of NvDVD. I thought DXVA controlled video sync anyway, but I guess I was wrong.
Sound quality is average. I still prefer PowerDVD's audio engine, especially for its (optional) DTS and Pro Logic II support and stellar downmixing options.
Surprisingly, it's only slightly more CPU-intensive than most decoders. However, it's not very graceful under heavy system load; instead of dropping frames it simply freezes, loses synch for a while, then steadily attempts to catch up once resources become available.
All I can personally say about it is that it has potential, but it won't be replacing the other decoders in my system anytime soon. It feels like a beta in many respects, and considering they're about to ship to OEMs, that's not a good sign.