Microsoft to WinFS: Drop Dead

Discussion in 'Submitted News' started by madmatt, Jun 24, 2006.

  1. madmatt

    madmatt Bow Down to the King Political User

    Messages:
    13,312
    Location:
    New York
    Microsoft has scrapped plans for a WinFS Beta 2. Instead, elements of WinFS are being rolled into other products.

    Going back to the early days in the development of what is now known as Windows Vista, there has been the concept of a new file system known as WinFS, which was to be an integral element in the new operating system. Last year, with great fanfare and a lot of bad press reaction, Microsoft "dropped" the WinFS filing system from what was Windows Longhorn at the time.

    The notion of the new file system being an integral part of the new platform was replaced by a new plan: develop the new Windows independently, and then ship WinFS as a standalone product in conjunction with the release of Windows Vista. Since WinFS was initially referred to as one of the "pillars" of Longhorn/Vista, once it was pulled out there naturally had to be a bit of damage control on Microsoft's part to convince the public that this "pillar" was not, in fact, that much of a "pillar" after all.

    It has taken some time, but they have succeeded in this, to some extent, and we haven't heard much about the "loss of WinFS" recently. Meanwhile, the WinFS Team has been toiling away at what was to be the separate delivery of the new technology. Now comes word that this will not happen after all. WinFS is, for all intents and purposes, dead.

    Source: Bink.nu (Pro Networks)
     
  2. Bman

    Bman OSNN Veteran Original

    Messages:
    8,799
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    I never read up on WinFS, what is it? Filesystem, as NTFS, FAT32??
     
  3. madmatt

    madmatt Bow Down to the King Political User

    Messages:
    13,312
    Location:
    New York
    Windows Future Storage (WinFS), is the codename for a data storage and management system based on relational databases. It was being developed by Microsoft between 2003 and 2006 for use as an advanced storage subsystem for the Microsoft Windows operating system.
     
  4. Bman

    Bman OSNN Veteran Original

    Messages:
    8,799
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Too bad
     
  5. ming

    ming OSNN Advanced

    Messages:
    4,252
    Location:
    UK
    From what I remember, it's not so much as to comparing it to NTFS or FAT, but the way Windows is supposed to store data. I think it was supposed to store or show ALL files by group/type/extension no matter where the actual file location is on the disk/partition. (ie Windows will show all jpgs no matter whether it's stored in C:windows or C: pictures.
     
    pokerblogger likes this.
  6. GEN3RIC

    GEN3RIC Moderator Folding Team

    Messages:
    634
    Location:
    Woodbury, MN
    i kept hearing it being compared to databases.. but I never really grasped the concept because Im having trouble differentiating between a database and how we store data now with our file systems.

    It was supposed to be uber efficient?
     
  7. Dublex

    Dublex Quazatron R6 droid

    Messages:
    624
    Location:
    Hertfordshire, UK
    I'm not sure if I would like the idea of a full database to be used to store data anyway. What would happen if the main root file became corrupted?

    I am aware that NTFS and FAT uses some database like referencing though.
     
  8. kcnychief

    kcnychief █▄█ ▀█▄ █ Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    16,948
    Location:
    Massachusetts