michale jackson enough said.

Discussion in 'Green Room' started by VenomXt, Sep 13, 2004.

  1. VenomXt

    VenomXt Blame me for the RAZR's Folding Team

    Messages:
    3,453
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    http://www.atgbook.net/


    intresting.. i have allways though that he was a bit off and i guess in the next 4-6 moths we will see if the courts do as well.

    (edit):[Michael] Jackson opps.i cant type today.

    and there was just a news story on it so the page is probaly being flooded.

    try this link as well www.allthatglittersbook.com
     
  2. PseudoKiller

    PseudoKiller Zug Zug

    Messages:
    3,858
    Location:
    Ice Crown Citadel
    whos michale??

    btw the link came up dead for me...
     
  3. Johnny

    Johnny .. Commodore .. Political User

    Messages:
    5,015
    Location:
    Happy Valley
    He's a fruitcake. Needs to be put in a mental ward or something.

    You know the funny thing is that since he's rich he is known as eccentric. If he was a normal joe like you and me he would be referred to as a pedophile nut case ..
     
  4. synd][cate

    synd][cate Chobo

    Messages:
    3
    Location:
    Calgary
    Michael Jackson might seem to exhibit the same behaviors that sick pedophile would portray; however, I believe he is harmless. Granting the fact that his whole childhood was taken away, forced into the production industry his entire youth. He does obviously have some mental deficientcies, but I honestly believe he thinks of himself as a kid and tries to do all the things a normal kid 30 years younger than himself would do.. lmao? To suggest anything sexual is not far from the spot, unless you look at the psychology going on up stairs.

    In my own opinion, Jackson is innocent and the general public would like to seem him put away just because. Because why? Everyone wants to think he's some sick pervert just because of the wierd things he does, but the world is too cruel to understand the psychology of his life.
     
  5. muzikool

    muzikool Act your wage. Political User

    It's one thing if people are making an assumption based on his behavior, it's another when children are accusing him of doing illegal things. Granted, the accusations could be false, but since the accusations exist Jackson must be put on trial. Evidence, or the lack thereof, will hopefully bring out the truth in the end.
     
  6. Johnny

    Johnny .. Commodore .. Political User

    Messages:
    5,015
    Location:
    Happy Valley
    fully 100% agree with muzikool .. I hope he is innocent, then he can shove it averyones face. If you look at it, he has been the target of jokes and accusations for years now. That makes it tough to believe whether what they say is true or not ..
     
  7. synd][cate

    synd][cate Chobo

    Messages:
    3
    Location:
    Calgary
    Well the law that the general public will do absolutely anything for money rings true about 100% of the time. If there is one thing that will make me sick, even more than if Jackson really is a pedophile, is these childrens parents persuading these kids to make up these stories.

    Really it is quite sad how much everyone actually hates/cares about Jackson (or any public figure for that matter), isn't in nice to make your own life seem normal contrasting it against people who day in and out offer their lives for critique by the masses. Unless this persons decisions directly effect your own life, what this person does or doesnt do shouldn't take up too much time out of your day.
     
  8. Tuffgong4

    Tuffgong4 The Donger Need Food!!!! Political User

    Messages:
    2,465
    Location:
    Chicago
    from all reports right now he is still a celebrity yes but by no means is he rich...he is in hellish debt with no end in sight and has not sold records like he used to...if he did may he burn in hell but if he didn't the people accusing him should have to pay him all the attorney fees back so he can go back to having the money he had
     
  9. wigan_ukmale

    wigan_ukmale OSNN Junior Addict

    Messages:
    45
    Location:
    St Helens
    "British reporter Martin Bashir refused to answer nearly all of the defence's questions on the second day of the trial in Santa Maria, California." - Is this because he tried his best to make Jackson look as bad a possible in his documentry, because his documentry started off all the accusations leading to this trial or because he's a cold blooded liar?

    And as for the Jury - "The jurors range in age from 20 to 79. The racial and ethnic breakdown appeared to be seven whites, four Hispanics and one Asian. There were no African Americans." - why no african american? Seems like the judge has made his mind up already and has chosen a jury that are more likely to find Jackson guilty. What hope has Jackson got now?
     
  10. Lee

    Lee OSNN Proxy

    michale? His name is Michael.
     
  11. falconguard

    falconguard Carbon based lifeform Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    3,406
    Location:
    SoCal
    isn't this an old argument? I remember seeing this thread before? deja vu?
     
  12. wigan_ukmale

    wigan_ukmale OSNN Junior Addict

    Messages:
    45
    Location:
    St Helens
    Oh sorry, thought I read somewhere that Michael Jackson was in court this week - so if this is old news I apologise.

    I was under the impression that OSNN Forum was for chatting about recent (current) topics. Just because this thread was opened last year doesn't mean its an "old argument".
     
  13. Lee

    Lee OSNN Proxy

    I don't think it is right to discuss it anyway, like when you're on jury service you cannot discuss details with anyone else.

    He is innocent to proven guilty, so till he is convicted or not convicted of what he is accused of, then we should not discuss it.
     
  14. falconguard

    falconguard Carbon based lifeform Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    3,406
    Location:
    SoCal
    uhmm, he seems to be going to court every two years when someone new keeps popping up. not that this is news, but maybe the fact that he did not settle this one out of court. ahh well he has money
     
  15. Lee

    Lee OSNN Proxy

    I can't see him being found guilty anyway. It's all based on a I.T.V.1 programme.

    This case will be thrown out soon, Orange Juice Simpson all over again.
     
  16. wigan_ukmale

    wigan_ukmale OSNN Junior Addict

    Messages:
    45
    Location:
    St Helens
    I don't think its right to discuss whether he's guilty or not guilty either (thats what the jury is for afterall), but I did think that people might want to discuss the progress of the case.
     
  17. Lee

    Lee OSNN Proxy

    Well all you will know is, reports on the radio, tv (bskyb 1) or news papers.

    They aren't showing it live, you don't have access to all the evidence so really, even watching the TV simulation by actors on bskyb 1 still makes no difference.

    I myself watched nearly all of the OJ Simpson case, I was shocked when he was found not guilty, for whatever reason, I feel this will be the same with Michael Jackson.

    Last I say on the matter.
     
  18. falconguard

    falconguard Carbon based lifeform Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    3,406
    Location:
    SoCal
    Lee, it isn't a case of celebrity as far as OJ, but a case of money
    Money buys good representation in court, and that makes all the difference.
    you can go up and down our court histories and see where money had an influence. I know not a glowing commendation of our law and it's practice, but what the hell, they are lawyers. They deserve to cannibalize their young
     
  19. paul2-0-0-2

    paul2-0-0-2 Moderator

    Messages:
    979
    fully 100% agree with muzikool ..

    same and the kids is moms a ****ing ........ :speechless:
     
    Lee likes this.
  20. muzikool

    muzikool Act your wage. Political User

    What hope has he got? Apparently juries without African Americans are prejudiced against black-turned-white pop stars. I hope you're joking. If you are, then you need to use a smilie with your post.

    The judge's duty is to weed out any potential juror who appears to be prejudiced one way or the other in the first place. What if potential African Americans jurors were found to be prejudiced against Jackson in some shape or form? Perhaps a perception exists amongst some African Americans that Jackson was ashamed of being black. That would give a judge pretty good reason to dismiss those people.

    I can't see any potential for a valid argument claiming that a jury lacking African Americans would be more threatening to Jackson than a jury with African Americans. This is not and should not be a race issue.