So in other words we should sanction more killing to stop the killing. Interesting. The Middle East has had problems since before the U.S. has existed. We have always policed other nations problems. Sometimes it helps, sometimes not. But to kill to solve a problem is not the way to do it. I don't have the answers, and it's not stupid political rhetoric it's the way things are. But stupid ideas like killing them all and be done with it is worse! You said, "I don't think violence is right but at this point I say F*ck um." That's scarry, I would not like to think what could happen. if you thinking this way, could possible do if you were in control.Originally posted by Lord Sphinktus
so stop trying to wash over what I am sayin with stupid political rhetoric and realize that these terrorist nations are causeing a serious world problem and that if we don't do something soon to erradicate all this intolerant behavior and compleat lack of respect tword fellow human beings we will eventually destroy what was not entirely ours to begin with, the world.
Originally posted by Lord Sphinktus
voicing ones opinions is not problem causing, but blowing people up is. I beleave that killing civilians in a non-military act is the lowest of the low. you saw what what we have done to all other countries that have ignored the right of a civilian to left out of war and that is exactly what I think should happen here. I think that if you support terrorism in any way no matter how swall you deserve to die and the world would be better off without you.
so stop trying to wash over what I am sayin with stupid political rhetoric and realize that these terrorist nations are causeing a serious world problem and that if we don't do something soon to erradicate all this intolerant behavior and compleat lack of respect tword fellow human beings we will eventually destroy what was not entirely ours to begin with, the world.
Originally posted by Lord Sphinktus
jingoism?? please define I don't know that one.
and there is a very real difference between terror and war.
though war is not pritty there is a certain honor to it. One declares war and then the soldiers fight until the conflict is resolved.
Terror is when a country or a group is too pussiefied to lose the fight fairly so they resort to blowing shit up and dodging the consiquesces.
We did not declair war nor did the middle east it was an underhanded cowardly thing they did
First off, you have no idea what I know about Logistics and War or to defend your Country or Desendents that faught and died for they're Country. Second, where am I from? born and raised in the U.S. and my Ancestors were here on both sides of the Border before your ancestors existed. And to really talk about terror, maybe if I bring up the way your ancestors came to this Country, not being their own and systematicaly slaughtered my Ancestors and drove them from their lands. Destroyed food supply (the Buffalo) to the point of extinction just to get rid of us. But we're still here. Not including the way we are still treated. Where do I come from? I'm still in the same place we've always been since the begining. Where do you come from Pilgrim?Originally posted by Lord Sphinktus
alright gonads it time for you to go study logistics
Logistics states that if one has a problem what is the best most effective way of removing the probem. Is to remove the cause of the problem.
Directly apposed to this is our beleaf that life is sacred and must not be taken in vain.
This is the only reason we have not done anything yet. these people have been problematic ever since the dawn of time. They are militant, ignorant, and greedy.
If I where in control I would take everyone out of there native countries and mix them all together while simutaniosly destroying all refrences to religion and culture world wide but since this is not possible I say we execute the merderers.
p.s. where are you from don't you know that probably your people willl eventually be hurt by the terrorists if this continues.