Intel v AMD questions

Discussion in 'General Hardware' started by stewartbmw2000, Nov 21, 2003.

  1. Is there any place that has an explantion of Intel and AMD processors, I.E the difference netween an AMD Athlon, Duron XP, + and intel pentium, celeron, centrino?

    I obviously know the difference between them just wanted a bit more detail and some intel v amd comparisons, both websites of the manufacturers are useless for that sort of thing.

    Cheers guys
     
  2. LeeJend

    LeeJend Moderator

    Messages:
    5,291
    Location:
    Fort Worth, TX
  3. EXACLTY what I was after, nice one me ol mucker
     
  4. Sazar

    Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    14,905
    Location:
    Between Austin and Tampa
    note that toms does have a bias vis-a-vis intel v/s amd...

    so read it for technical information if you must but don't put much weight in the graphs... toms generally manage to add some ridiculously confusing graphs to the equation...

    still their explanation of the architecture should suffice to explain the differences :)
     
  5. mokuni

    mokuni Guest

    i thought tom was pro intel? didnt they have a debate bout this a while ago? hmm dunno but yea tomshardware lots of info...sometimes..tooo much info...=(
     
  6. LeeJend

    LeeJend Moderator

    Messages:
    5,291
    Location:
    Fort Worth, TX
    LMAO, they are pro whoever gave them the most hardware to play with last.

    Though having ot be pro ATI seems to be sticking in their craws right now.

    Like SAZAR said. Read for technical content. Most sites praise whoever's stuff they are testing in some way or form. The part that has me ROFL is how they say one product is the best when the difference is <1% across the whole test range.

    One distrubing thing I've noted lately is Tom's is doing fewer head to head tests between competitors. Seems to be more which flavor of a particular chipset/processor is best these days.
     
  7. Yharn

    Yharn meh.

    Messages:
    324
    Location:
    Indiana, USA
  8. wyrlwyn

    wyrlwyn Guest

    i heard via's C3s are better then both....
    *sniffs air for sarcasm*
     
  9. j79zlr

    j79zlr Glaanies script monkey Political User

    Messages:
    2,725
    Location:
    Chicago
    I think Toms used to be very AMD biased a couple years ago, but lately seem to be leaning towards Intel, maybe they make a better product...........
     
  10. maybe some back handers going on
     
  11. Zedric

    Zedric NTFS Guru Folding Team

    Messages:
    4,006
    Location:
    Sweden
    Yeah, no need for a huge PSU or big fans. :)
     
  12. Syrus

    Syrus OSNN Addict

    Messages:
    190
    The Intels use more clock puleses than the AMDs so the athlons are faster and doing things where as the intels take a lil longer but are more stable and stay at a lower temp and with them being at a lower temp even with the basic intel heatsink think u get with retail cpus u can overclock them quite abit.
     
  13. Sazar

    Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    14,905
    Location:
    Between Austin and Tampa
    amd and intel went different routes with their chip designs...

    amd decided they wanted more work per clock cycle... and achieved this with lower latencies than intel..

    intel alternatively went with higher clock speeds to compensate for the lesser work per clock cycle...

    @ the high end of the spectrum (non 64bit processors... for arguments sake) intel and amd processors generate around the same amount of heat... although I must say intel processors overclock quite well :)

    I just finished installing and setting up a p4 3.0c processor on an msi 865 Neo2 fisr mobo with corsair xms ddr3200 ... and it is quite a revelation... I absolutely love PAT :cool: