HD Reliability for Storage

Discussion in 'General Hardware' started by LeeJend, Feb 3, 2009.

?

Reliability HD Recomendation

Poll closed Feb 8, 2009.
  1. <500 Gig

    25.0%
  2. ~500-640 Gig

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. ~ 750G-1TB

    75.0%
  1. LeeJend

    LeeJend Moderator

    Messages:
    5,291
    Location:
    Fort Worth, TX
    I have DVD's dying of old age and want to bulk storte them on a HD. Need a reliable one but 500 GIG plus units seem to have a 10%-15% infant mortality rate so I'm hesistant to go as big as I need.

    Please advise and vote.
     
  2. American Zombie

    American Zombie Moderator Staff Member Political User

    Messages:
    2,931
    Location:
    Seattle
    You are gonna store on HD only?

    If so and this is really critical data then I would still store a copy on DVD.
     
  3. bmclaughlin

    bmclaughlin Let's break something.

    Messages:
    45
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    How much are you willing to spend and how important is the data?

    Personally, I'd go with an e-sata Raid enclosure, with 500 gig disks set up in Raid 5. That way if one drive fails, you can just replace it and all your data is still intact.
     
  4. LordOfLA

    LordOfLA Godlike!

    Messages:
    7,027
    Location:
    Maidenhead, Berkshire, UK
    Hard disks are more reliable than DVD. Unless you are willing to pay a premium for premium made Optical media the bio-dyes and layer binding glues deteriorate dramattically over time and can destory the disks.

    Smaller hard disks are cheaper, faster and longer lived. - just make sure to run something like GRC spinrite occasionally over the disks to read/write-back the data to counteract the earths tendency to erase magnetic media over time.

    Larger disks though convenient are more prone to substantial data loss.
     
  5. Johnny

    Johnny .. Commodore .. Political User

    Messages:
    5,015
    Location:
    Happy Valley
    Yeah, if you are going to do something like that I would get a raid setup with the best redundancy available .. Then if a drive fails, you won't lose all the data ..
     
  6. LeeJend

    LeeJend Moderator

    Messages:
    5,291
    Location:
    Fort Worth, TX
    The plan was to burn DVDs to watch and then keep a backup on a HD for when the DVDs get flaky. The HD would be external and only be connected when I wanted to clear off my regular hard disk.

    A few percent of my saved movies become unreadable after a while and a few more got scratched. There has been no pattern with media brand, just a few that randomly go bad after a few months. Some of those I lost were good ones and I don't feel like paying for them again. Since HD long term storage is highly reliable I felt it was better than burning 2 sets of the DVD, though that is an option.

    Eventually I will get off my lazy butt and put together a multimedia server but for now I'm looking cheap and fast. I can do a 1T external for $120. Also, I do not like wasting the electricity an always on server consumes. Color me Green.

    Mainly I was looking for feed back on the reliability of BIG, non-redundant hard drives. I have never had an issue with a drive under 160gig failing.
     
  7. tdinc

    tdinc █▄█ ▀█▄ █ Political User

    Messages:
    3,507
    Location:
    Sterling Heights, MICHIGAN
  8. Johnny

    Johnny .. Commodore .. Political User

    Messages:
    5,015
    Location:
    Happy Valley
  9. tdinc

    tdinc █▄█ ▀█▄ █ Political User

    Messages:
    3,507
    Location:
    Sterling Heights, MICHIGAN
    the drobo is nice,,, but you can build a cheaper and better media center with eSATA drives w 4 port bay
     
  10. Johnny

    Johnny .. Commodore .. Political User

    Messages:
    5,015
    Location:
    Happy Valley
    That is true, tdinc. But at least it is an option ......
     
  11. tdinc

    tdinc █▄█ ▀█▄ █ Political User

    Messages:
    3,507
    Location:
    Sterling Heights, MICHIGAN
    w00t! :smoker: