Just in case you are still worried about the TOS, which BTW is the same as any of Google's TOS's, you can get a BSD licensed version here:
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-xp/
http://code.google.com/chromium/
Contains the code in case you want to download the source code, take a look at it, and compile it for yourself!
They even break down the different licenses and what software was included from where on their terms page:
http://code.google.com/chromium/terms.html
You may now take off your tinfoil hats, and enjoy a new faster browser.
You may now take off your tinfoil hats, and enjoy a new faster browser.
it's not a tin foil hat, they are claiming that anything you post on the web is theirs to use at their discretion or non discretion
by submitting, posting or displaying the content you give google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any content which you submit, post or display on or through, the services.
they can change their uela or they can count on people like me telling everyone on the internet they are batty to use this browser
I am surprised you read this adn are fine with it, you especially have original content you post, I really don't think you want google to have rights to that property but I understand if you don't mind
there are those of us who refuse to allow google or anyone to use our property without compensation or approval
their source code doesn't matter, what they do now with their browser doesn't matter, by signing the eula you have given them the right to change their mind and go back and take whatever it is you posted with their browser
you use their browswer you are telling them whattever intelectual content they want to take from you they can
some of us do NOT want them to have the rights to our work, myself being one of them
if this were 8 years ago, while I still wouldn't use it because of the uela, I would have said the agreement was unconcionable and therfore un enforceable according to our law, what if someone who didn't sign the uela posted content with their browser, how can they own that?
but in the states we have been given a gift these last 8 years, the gift of judges who will always decide om behalf of industry rather then the individual.
I will be quite an oponent of this browser until google changes their uela
