Ghost or Drive Image?

Discussion in 'Windows Desktop Systems' started by robin.munro, May 4, 2002.

  1. robin.munro

    robin.munro Guest

    Which would you say is the better, not so much for speed, more reliability...

    Norton Ghost 2002
    Drive Image 2002

  2. Static 99

    Static 99 Guest

    My opinion is, that they are both reliable. But, for use at home, Drive Image is the better choice. It's got enough functions for your basic (disaster) needs. And it's very easy to use. But you can't use it over a network.
    So, for the more heavy duty stuff (installing an image on 500 pc's!), i would recommend Ghost.
  3. Sgt Shultz

    Sgt Shultz Guest

    I used Ghost 7.5 Corporate Edition.
    The boot floppy is all thats needed to make and restore backups.
  4. Dick Johnson

    Dick Johnson Guest

    Drive Image

    I have bought nearly all the versions of Drive Image and really like them. Simple to run. I just bought the NEW "Drive Image 2002" which can now do disk to disk copying/cloning within Windows. Take a look at this new program!
  5. Doxtr111

    Doxtr111 Guest

    Hell, I tried using drive image 5.0 to do a disk to disk copy for new drive. When finished, program said that it had hidden old drive partitions and made new drive partitions active, but upon reboot no drives recognized, period. Went through hell and ended up doing a clean install of xp, losing all of my good stuff developed over months of use, etc.