ATi 5.6 overview

Discussion in 'Windows Desktop Systems' started by zeke_mo, Jun 1, 2005.

  1. zeke_mo

    zeke_mo (value not set) Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    1,984
    Location:
    Placerville, CA
  2. Petros

    Petros Thief IV

    Messages:
    3,038
    Location:
    Pacific Northwest
    Finally...a release that focuses on performance. Not that bugfixes are bad, but WAAAAY back in the day (2000), driver updates were all about performance gains. Nice to see some of that back.
     
  3. Howling Wolf

    Howling Wolf We did not deserve this !

    Messages:
    1,243
    Location:
    Amongst the Native Ones
    Is my 9800 Pro too old now ? I wonder...
     
  4. mlakrid

    mlakrid OSNN BASSMASTER Political User Folding Team

    I was wondering the same thing for my powercolor 9100

    Last update listed for it was nov 2003....

    Ugggh and it wont run World of Warcraft without locking up... and my friend is using a TNT2 64MB version and it can run his.... what gives...
     
  5. vivid_vibe

    vivid_vibe OSNN Senior Addict

    Messages:
    406
    Wow, that sounds too good to be true. Guess I'll find out soon.
     
  6. Kr0m

    Kr0m Moderator

    Messages:
    1,390
    Location:
    Turtle Island
    Hmm, wonder if my 9200SE will see any *noticable* improvement.
     
  7. Sazar

    Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    14,905
    Location:
    Between Austin and Tampa
    Noticeable improvements will always be primarily limited to the newer tech because by now we have squeezed most of the performance out of the older cards.

    The r3xx might see more improvements because dx9 shader speed increases will still affect it.
     
  8. Son Goku

    Son Goku No lover of dogma

    Well, my gut instinct would be in concurance with what saz is saying here... The cards, after all have been out for awhile... There is one note worth mentioning however from this article:

    Depending on the number of unseen pixels that get removed, there is a possibility for some performance increase. Anyone familiar with the differences between a tiler (though the card obviously won't become one) and the traditional gfx architecture will know what I'm getting at here. The Prophet 4500 was able to get some performance increase (being a tiler) but not rendering unseen pixels...

    But what exactly they will remove, and how this will impact performance. I guess time will tell, as no doubt after the drivers are out (and with these claims), various review sites will start benching them...
     
  9. LordOfLA

    LordOfLA Godlike!

    Messages:
    7,027
    Location:
    Maidenhead, Berkshire, UK
    Uhm, hate to be a smart ass but they will remove unseen pixels. You will get a speed increase because the shader engine then doenst waste time processing them. :p


    Kinda obvious from the article really :D
     
  10. Son Goku

    Son Goku No lover of dogma

    Umm, :lol: I already said that in my second paragraph, where I said...

    What I was getting at, in the part of my post that you quoted was, what will get removed (in the context of, to what extent). Yes they'll be removing pixels, but how many will get removed, and to what extent... Depending on how much we see in the way of hidden pixel removal, will depend on just how much of a load (in rendering pixels which aren't seen) is taken off the gfx chip... Perhaps I could have phrased it a little better...

    Besides, as someone who formerly owned a Prophet 4500, which was actually based on a tile based architecture, the performance benefits one saw varied from game to game, and this was with a card which was based upon a tile based architecture... Some games (with a lot of unseen pixels) benefited greately, compared to the competition; whereas other games didn't perform quite so well (in comparison) due to the slower chip and as I remember lower clocked memory... This isn't unlikely where the suggested 10-50% performance improvement is comming from. But as ATI's card isn't actually based upon a tile based architecture, I'm suspecting that the degree of hidden pixel removal might be a bit less...

    Actually, in general principle I'm expecting the same as saz, as the arch has been around for awhile. But in theory, what they suggested seems plausible (hence my above consideration) and I'm willing to take a wait and see attitude. The suggestion certainly isn't unreasonable (if that's what they're in fact doing)...
     
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2005
  11. LordOfLA

    LordOfLA Godlike!

    Messages:
    7,027
    Location:
    Maidenhead, Berkshire, UK
    Heheh I think you're over ananlysing what will happen. THe drivers will remove unseen pixels. THe exact count will depend on the game and where you got the camera pointing.. there is no context or extent to worry about. If you aint gonna see it, the card wont process them. Therefore it wont wste clock cyles on useless calculations so will give you a speed increase.

    It may not be a stellar increase but there will be an increase.

    Edit: unfortunate typo in "count" :p
     
  12. Son Goku

    Son Goku No lover of dogma

    You see, I don't think this is necessarily going to be the case. ATI's card isn't really a tiler, and I don't think these drivers will make it a full fledged tiler. Therefore, no I don't expect it to remove 100% of all unseen pixels from processing, aka the perf benefit could be less then one could expect if it was running like a full fledged tiler...

    But to what degree, especially if it removes some of the work load from the GPU, but not necessarily all... Course, time will tell, and when these puppys are out, we can expect many websites to put them through their paces, and get back to everyone with the bench results...

    And actually, looking at the article again

    A tiler like the Kyro 2 (which the 10-50% performance improvement seems close to something I remember from discussions back then) didn't just remove hidden pixels from the shader (actually I don't think they had shaders back on that chip, but I could probably look it up again)...

    Edit:

    I keep comparing what they're doing (hidden pixel/surface removal) to what was done on tilers such as Power VR's cards, the Kyro 2 (which was the gfx chip found on the Prophet 4500), etc.. Perhaps pulling up an old article (from time past) will help clarify, what exactly was done there, and how what is being suggested with ATI's drivers isn't necessarily as encompassing as what was done there...

    BTW, and in all do fairness, there is mention given in the article to 3dfx and nVidia having said

    Indication was however, that had 3dfx stayed in business (and following Rampage, which is what would have come out following Voodoo5), the card after Rampage would have been using a tile based architecture... They're stocks plummeted, nVidia bought much of their assets, and the rest was history...

    http://www.beyond3d.com/articles/tilebasedrendering/index1.php

    As can be seen in the pages, with statements such as this:

    what was done here seems to go beyond what is being suggested for these drivers (including differences on how things are transfered into the frame buffer itself) to achieve the level of hidden surface removal and performance benefits that tilers saw... I'm not really convinced all the benefits to a tile based arch could be achieved without revising the hardware... In fact, meniton of Z optomizations sort of rule it out:

    I'm sure some benefits could be seen if they find a way to prevent some of the hidden pixels from being processed, and though a tiler is the closest thing I can think of (which demonstrates the ability to use hidden surface removal to boost performance), the architectures are fundamentally different.

    I do seem to remember some mention of Z-optomizations in the past wrt one hardware company (nVidia perhaps?), for perhaps similar reason... It was so long ago, the specifics aren't fresh in my mind however, so plz don't quote me on this last paragraph...
     
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2005
  13. zeke_mo

    zeke_mo (value not set) Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    1,984
    Location:
    Placerville, CA
    Maybe nVidia will learn from this and put out some new drivers :)