9600XT questionssss

Discussion in 'Graphics Cards' started by the_music_man, Jun 18, 2004.

  1. the_music_man

    the_music_man aka prodj88 =P

    Messages:
    2,401
    Location:
    USA
    yeah im about to order an ATI 9600XT (w/ VIVO) ...but before i do I want to know if any1 has one and hows the video-in quality??? i wonder if it compares to what i was gonna get which was teh winfast 2000 xp tuner...? hmm
     
  2. Blade195

    Blade195 OSNN Addict

    Messages:
    111
    I have a radeon 9600 Pro and I believe the Video-in quality and the Image quality is both good. However, I'm not speaking relatively to the XP 2000 tuner. I've never used the tuner before. And if you suddenly feel an urge to play recent games in decent quality, the new card will come in handy as well.
     
  3. the_music_man

    the_music_man aka prodj88 =P

    Messages:
    2,401
    Location:
    USA
    well hopefully it will suite my needs
     
  4. the_music_man

    the_music_man aka prodj88 =P

    Messages:
    2,401
    Location:
    USA
    oh and should i get the 128mb version or the 256? i know the 128 mb's memory is faster but maybe the 256 will be better for the long run???
     
  5. GoNz0

    GoNz0 NTFS Stoner

    Messages:
    2,781
    Location:
    the year 2525
    256mb, i remember when they said, dont get a 128mb card ;)
     
  6. w00kiec00kie

    w00kiec00kie OSNN Addict

    Messages:
    81
    er.. the 9600xt doesnt really need 256 in my opinion, since 128 will suit the needs for most gaming unless you play in like 1600/1200 at 6AA and 16AF, but then the thing is, the 9600xt itself is probably not able to handle that kind of options in the first place anyhow, so it will be mostly useless to have 256mb...

    in all, it just doesnt justify the price difference. but then again, i might be wrong, and the choice is yours.
     
  7. LeeJend

    LeeJend Moderator

    Messages:
    5,291
    Location:
    Fort Worth, TX
    I have the winfast 2000 and a friend just got a radeon all in wonder.
    Go with the radeon, capture quality is noticeably better.

    As for the memory I'd put the extra money towards a 9800 PRO AIW 128 instead of going for texture memory that may not get used in the next couple of years.
     
  8. Blade195

    Blade195 OSNN Addict

    Messages:
    111
    Certainly not the 256 MB version. 9600 XT don't have the necessary power to make use of the extra memory. 128 Mb will be fine and will save money.
     
  9. champ2005

    champ2005 | xs |

    Messages:
    238
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    256mb sounds better though - and might help in games like far cry, maybe...
     
  10. Blade195

    Blade195 OSNN Addict

    Messages:
    111
    It will help, but won't even get close to making the difference of what you've paid extra for. It just ain't noticeable, significant enough to pay more for. If you were talking about cards like 9800 Pro and above, the 256Mb will come in handy with recent games coming out.
     
  11. Sazar

    Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    14,905
    Location:
    Between Austin and Tampa
    256mb for your card is going to make little to no difference...

    you'll buy a coupla fps perhaps @ most in high LOD situations but the fps are going to be unplayable anyways...

    if you have a HIGH-END card then yes... go for the 256mb version... the low-mid range cards do fine with 128 and the extra mem is a waste...

    basically a marketing gimmick...

    blade said it right :)