3d MARK 2001SE (330 Build)

Discussion in 'Benchmarks & Performance' started by Fire_Two, Jul 7, 2002.

  1. Fire_Two

    Fire_Two Guest

    Just wondering i got this new 3d mark score of 12204 on my first run this a good score?
     
  2. Electronic Punk

    Electronic Punk Administrator Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    18,590
    Location:
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Depends on your system specs really don't it ;)
     
  3. Fire_Two

    Fire_Two Guest

  4. Fire_Two

    Fire_Two Guest

    ta =)

    ne ways this 1.6a does fly! beat ne amd i used to have.
     
  5. Fire_Two

    Fire_Two Guest

    128mb gf3 nice =)

    ur overlock on gfx card iz very low thou my olg gf3 classic hit 258/562.
     
  6. Fire_Two

    Fire_Two Guest

    trust me m8 u wont get near my 560+ on the mem! and that core was cooled by a crystal orb.
     
  7. Fire_Two

    Fire_Two Guest

    128mb cards use slower ram then 64mb cards ie 64mb cards can clock loads higher.

    i think ur max out around 540's. 550 if lucky.
     
  8. Fire_Two

    Fire_Two Guest

    Grinder714

    wot score u get u look like u have a nice system apart from PSU lil lower there?
     
  9. Grinder714

    Grinder714 Guest

    at default settings no OC varies between 10,900 to 11,050. Depending on what progs I have running.


    OC that's a different story, I don't feel the need to do it with this system....yet. But I have tried ;) and I feel its unfair to compare overclocked Intel's to overclocked AMD, being as amd's are overclocked from the factory. That would be unfair.
     
  10. Fire_Two

    Fire_Two Guest

    errr

    being as amd's are overclocked from the factory


    never heard that 1 b4 m8.
     
  11. Grinder714

    Grinder714 Guest

    well now you have...kinda explains the heat issue. Just my .$02

    But that has been talked about/discussed in these threads many times. Do a search for it, it does not belong in this thread. You can pick it up in one of those threads if they are not closed.
     
  12. Grinder714

    Grinder714 Guest

    ***after digressing****

    That's a damn Good score!!!!
     
  13. fitfella29

    fitfella29 Guest

    http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=3877678

    windows xp pro
    amd athlon xp 1700+
    896mb pc2100 ddr
    jetway 866as ultra motherboard
    leadtek gf4 ti 4400 128mb ddr
    40gb seagate 5200rpm hdd
    60gb maxtor udma-133 7200rpm hdd
    pioneer 16x dvd
    liteon 32X12X40
    realtek 10/100 family fast ethernet nic
    cable modem 1meg/256k
    19" lg flatron
    microsoft intellimouse optical
    creative soundworks digital
     
  14. Shawn319

    Shawn319 Guest

  15. Shawn319

    Shawn319 Guest

    Grinder, i would be very interested in seeing your 3Dmark2001 results :) since our PC's are so similure...
     
  16. Grinder714

    Grinder714 Guest

    10,900 to 11,050 depending on all the crap I have running.

    Am going to try the omega driver and see if there is any improvement.
     
  17. Shawn319

    Shawn319 Guest

    here's my Omega benchmark (with default 3dmark settings): http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=3877926


    I did do a benchmark before this one with high reso (1280x1024x32 i think) + 4x AA. it did make the FPS go to hell (around 18-90 on everything) but it looks AMAZING!!! the 3dmark for that one was like 3500ish.

    the thing about omega drivers is not better FPS, but instead better graphics. there isint much of a drop though.
     
  18. Fire_Two

    Fire_Two Guest

    these new drivers look crap, 4 bench marks but good say 4 counter strike saves me having to set the LOD to mkae it look better and get rid of the blur.
     
  19. Grinder714

    Grinder714 Guest

    Shawn, I noticed your FSB is running at 100MH? I don't see anything in your specs about your Motherboard. With a system like that, your fsb should be at least 133MH.

    I could be wrong, just something seems odd there.
     
  20. Fire_Two

    Fire_Two Guest

    he has rdram 800 stuff ie his fsb is 100 then x4 by the ram = 400.