|
|
![]() |
|
|
Top | #1 |
|
OSNN Addict
Joined: December 2008
Posts: 51
Reputation: 20
Power: 39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #2 |
|
Paul Reed Smith
Joined: January 2004
Location: Happy Valley
Posts: 4,838
Reputation: 2369
Power: 170 |
The iPod touches are awesome, but, personally; I am going to get a zen just for the fact that I plan to get a blackberry and that does everything the iPod does, but with pizazz
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #3 |
|
F@H - Is it in you?
Joined: April 2002
Location: Between Austin and Tampa
Posts: 14,880
Reputation: 4110
Power: 309 |
iPhone > iPodTouch just because you can get on ANYWHERE and with Orb, Joost and Pandora, you have all the streaming media you can handle without needing a wifi network
![]() And the stock headphones are pants. Zune stock headphones > Apple for sound quality. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #4 |
|
OSNN Senior Addict
Joined: December 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 406
Reputation: 110
Power: 44 |
Originally Posted by Sazar
The iPod Touch 2G is > iPhone because it has a faster processor! The only downside is that it can't be jailbroken. It can be used as a phone for making free calls to other iPhone/iPod Touch users. You would need the TruPhone app (free) to do this. Here's an article on it:
http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keat...nto-iphone.asp If any iPod Touch 2G user here wants to try Truphone, here is the app store download link: http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/M...294325816&mt=8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #5 |
|
F@H - Is it in you?
Joined: April 2002
Location: Between Austin and Tampa
Posts: 14,880
Reputation: 4110
Power: 309 |
It has a faster processor which assists in some games and not by much.
Using them side by side, there is no comparison, the fact that you can actually use the phone functions by going to Google, pulling up a site and clicking to launch the map or the phone function is a big win. And, I can be online ANYWHERE there is Edge, 3G or wifi. There is a big advantage over the iPod touch. Using VOIP or other things is possible, but my point is about the overall functionality. There is no comparison in that respect. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #6 |
|
We Speak Geek
Joined: July 2003
Location: Fredericton, Canada ex Norwich, England ex Hougang, Singapore ex Durban, South Africa
Posts: 1,249
Reputation: 460
Power: 121 |
Sazar, you're forgetting one simple thing:
Monthly rates. None with the iPod Touch. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #7 |
|
OSNN Senior Addict
Joined: December 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 406
Reputation: 110
Power: 44 |
Originally Posted by Sazar
Actually you're right about this! iPhone hardware is better than the iPod Touch. I was thinking about AT&T and the horrible service/prices it has when I made that post.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Ipod Touch | lancer | Macintosh | 9 | December 5th, 2008 12:41am |
| FS: Ipod touch 16GB | failurbydesign | Garage Sale | 0 | September 21st, 2008 8:57pm |
| iPhone/iPod Touch Application Reviews | Sazar | Portable Devices & Gadgets | 4 | September 15th, 2008 5:51am |
| iPod Touch Video Question | Hypnotoad1234 | Portable Devices & Gadgets | 5 | September 29th, 2007 11:57am |
| 1GB iPod nano introduced, iPod shuffle price change | muzikool | Portable Devices & Gadgets | 11 | February 8th, 2006 5:26pm |