|
|
![]() |
|
|
Top | #1 |
|
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: July 2003
Location: Fife; Scotland
Posts: 1,693
Reputation: 550
Power: 130 |
I am wondering if anyone can advise of a stable release of a linux distribution and/or BSD distribution that will run on this hardware which will take advantage of the dual-processors and all the other Intel Hardware. My initial thought is to run FreeBSD 6.2 on the system, which will be running F@H, serving http, ftp and ssh accounts. As well as an eggdrop botnet. Can anyone see any problems with the idea of this? Perhaps any personal accounts of the above hardware? This is being used to replace my current Pentium 3 800MHz, with 128MB Ram and a 20GB IDE drive. Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #2 |
|
We Speak Geek
Joined: July 2003
Location: Fredericton, Canada ex Norwich, England ex Hougang, Singapore ex Durban, South Africa
Posts: 1,249
Reputation: 460
Power: 124 |
Ubuntu Server!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #3 |
|
Glaanies script monkey
Joined: February 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,725
Reputation: 1520
Power: 155 |
I don't see any problems with FreeBSD 6.2. It has eggdrop in the ports tree and of course ftp http and ssh. F@H is a linux binary but should work fine. I always find FreeBSD to be the best server OS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #4 |
|
*
Joined: December 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 6,496
Reputation: 2808
Power: 220 |
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE will run perfectly and do what you want to do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #5 |
|
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: July 2003
Location: Fife; Scotland
Posts: 1,693
Reputation: 550
Power: 130 |
Just a further question regarding F@H - Will I need to install the Linux Binary Compatibility packages from sysinstall in order for this to run then I suppose?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #6 |
|
*
Joined: December 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 6,496
Reputation: 2808
Power: 220 |
Originally Posted by sean.ferguson
Yes, indeed.
http://0x58.com/guides/daemontools.xml http://0x58.com/guides/folding@home.xml Is how I usually set up my F@H clients. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #7 |
|
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: March 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 7,805
Reputation: 1490
Power: 217 |
I'd love to run F@H on a couple of the servers I've got kicking around, but I abhor linux-compat
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #8 |
|
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: July 2003
Location: Fife; Scotland
Posts: 1,693
Reputation: 550
Power: 130 |
Originally Posted by X-Istence
Thanks, those should come in helpful.
Originally Posted by Geffy
Why?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #9 |
|
*
Joined: December 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 6,496
Reputation: 2808
Power: 220 |
I don't understand why Geffy dislikes it, I can't come up with any reasons to dislike it. It is not as up to date as it should probably be, and is missing some components that Linux has, so newer programs written for 2.6 and compiled against it, may be using syscall's that don't exist in the Linux compat layer.
Hmm, a reason he may dislike it, and why it is not installed on any of my servers is it allows crackers to then download a Linux binary to a FreeBSD machine and use it, making it harder to lock the machine down by removing access to gcc. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Network Shares Problem - Windows Home Server/Server 2003 | indyjones | Windows Server Systems | 5 | December 2nd, 2007 11:30pm |
| Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Pro Q6600 | indyjones | Benchmarks & Performance | 30 | July 23rd, 2007 7:02pm |
| windows server 2003 standard or slackware linux as server | Dark Atheist | Benchmarks & Performance | 27 | July 19th, 2007 12:24am |
| Intel Introduces Xeon 5100 Server Chip | madmatt | Submitted News | 2 | June 27th, 2006 12:19pm |
| NT4 server user base import to 2003 server? | GeorgGG | Windows Desktop Systems | 8 | December 18th, 2003 6:31am |