Reply
Old February 29th, 2004 Top | #1
 
apu95's Avatar
Caffeine-->Code Converter
Joined: April 2002
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 502
Reputation: 60
Power: 128

Default which linux distro on a dell?

im running a sort of modified dell dimension 8250. i say sort of modified cuz ive changed some parts like the video card and sound card. the other main modification i have is that i formatted the HD and installed xp pro without all the crap that dell puts in OEM version of xp.

anyway, i wanna try linux again (i tried red hat a long time ago but forgot everything) but ive heard that linux is kinda hard to install in dells. im pretty sure i read somewhere that mandrake can be installed in dells, but ive no idea what one had to do to accomplish that.

any distro that'll work with this dell?

thx!

Apu

Telepathic: Q6600, 4 GB, HD3650, Audigy, Win7 64

Phantom: P4 3.0 800 FSB, D865GBFL, 512 DDR400, Radeon 9200 128, SB Live 5.1, WD 80gb, 16x DVD, Samsung SW-204B 40x24x40 CD-RW

Psychic: ASUS M50SV: Core 2 Duo T8100, 3GB DDR2, nVidia 9500GS, 250GB (Win7), BluRay, 802.11b/g/n
apu95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 29th, 2004 Top | #2

OSNN Folding Team  
NetRyder's Avatar
Tech Junkie
Joined: April 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,256
Reputation: 4260
Power: 298

Default

Since it's a desktop, I wouldn't think it would be very difficult getting any major distribution of linux working with it. All of the individual hardware components are made by other manufacturers in any case, so if linux drivers exist for them, it doesn't matter if it's a custom built CPU or a Dell.

In fact, I've installed several different versions of Slackware (currently on 9.1) on a Dell Inspiron 5100, which is a laptop (see sig). I've seen several sites that indicate Debian, Gentoo and RedHat work fine with it as well. Usually, hardware compatibility in linux is supposed to be a bigger issue with laptops, but almost everything worked for me right after a fresh installation of Slackware. The only thing I needed to tweak was ACPI support to get battery/temperature status, but that now works too.

For some reason, people consider Slackware to be one of the more difficult distros, and I think this has to do with the fact that almost all configuration is file-based rather than wizard-based. But to tell you the truth, I've had less luck with RedHat as far as hardware compatibility goes. Have to admit that I last tried RedHat a long time ago, and I'm sure its hardware support has become much better since then, but as they say, "once you go slack, you can't go back."

With that said, your best bet is to check that there are linux drivers for all your major hardware components. Google is really useful for this.
If there are drivers, and they don't get installed with a default install of the distro you're considering, you can always compile them in yourself.
NetRyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 29th, 2004 Top | #3
 
apu95's Avatar
Caffeine-->Code Converter
Joined: April 2002
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 502
Reputation: 60
Power: 128

Default

slackware eh? ill take a look at it too...are the differences major between slack and mandrake? ive looked for linux drivers for the major stuff (particularly my 802.11b usb adapter) and ive found for most of them so i wont worry much about that yet.

Telepathic: Q6600, 4 GB, HD3650, Audigy, Win7 64

Phantom: P4 3.0 800 FSB, D865GBFL, 512 DDR400, Radeon 9200 128, SB Live 5.1, WD 80gb, 16x DVD, Samsung SW-204B 40x24x40 CD-RW

Psychic: ASUS M50SV: Core 2 Duo T8100, 3GB DDR2, nVidia 9500GS, 250GB (Win7), BluRay, 802.11b/g/n
apu95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 1st, 2004 Top | #4

OSNN Folding Team  
NetRyder's Avatar
Tech Junkie
Joined: April 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,256
Reputation: 4260
Power: 298

Default

Which distribution you choose is just a matter of personal preference. Mine happens to be Slackware.

If you do decide to take the plunge and install Slackware, don't expect to see any wizards that will do everything for you though. It's one of those distros that forces you to learn the workings of the OS. While this requires more initial ground-work than Mandrake or Redhat for example, it really helps when you face a problem...believe me. Since you've done most of the configuration on Slackware yourself, you know where to look when something goes wrong.

Just my opinion. Sometimes you never know what works best for you until you've tried multiple distros.
NetRyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 1st, 2004 Top | #5
Reg
 
Reg's Avatar
eXperienced!
Joined: March 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 639
Reputation: 100
Power: 132

Default

Personally, I prefer Debian. I do use Mandrake on my Sony laptop, but all my desktops are Debian (exception is one Windows server, one windows XP desktop for beta testing, and my personal desktop which is an iMac).
Reg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 1st, 2004 Top | #6

OSNN Folding Team  
NetRyder's Avatar
Tech Junkie
Joined: April 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,256
Reputation: 4260
Power: 298

Default

Yeah, Debian is definitely a very good one too. I tried it sometime last year after JJB6486 recommended it. apt-get was quite convenient back then when swaret and slapt-get didn't exist.
NetRyder is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
which x64 Linux distro? Dark Atheist Linux & BSD 23 July 6th, 2008 12:59pm
Favorite Linux Distro ? Joel980 Linux & BSD 15 December 20th, 2007 10:10am
O'REILLY- Linux Distro Comparison tdinc Linux & BSD 1 April 15th, 2006 5:26am
which Linux distro CHiLLaXen Linux & BSD 15 January 13th, 2004 6:24pm
New Linux Distro (Xandros) SPeedY_B Linux & BSD 8 October 24th, 2002 10:05pm