|
|
![]() |
|
|
Top | #1 |
|
There is no answer!
Joined: October 2004
Location: FL, USA
Posts: 3,087
Blog Entries: 3
Reputation: 1430
Power: 134 |
Brightness: 300 cd/m2 Contrast Ratio: 500:1 Display Colours: 16.7 Million Display Type: WXGA+ Horizontal Fresh Rate: 24-80 kHz Maximum Resolution: 1440x900 Panel: Active Matrix, TFT LCD Recommended Resolution: 1440x900 Vertical Fresh Rate: 50-75 Hz Viewing Angle: 150°(H) / 130°(V) |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #2 |
|
OSNN Addict
Joined: June 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 125
Reputation: 90
Power: 71 |
I'm lovin' my new NEC!
Brightness: 400 cd/m2 Contrast Ratio: 1000:1 Response Time: 6ms (If you're a gamer, this is most important! The lower the better!) Maximum Resolution: 1600X1200 (native) Panel: Active Matrix, TFT LCD Recommended Resolution: 1600X1200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #3 |
|
I may actually be insane.
Joined: March 2002
Location: Midlands, England
Posts: 15,800
Reputation: 2877
Power: 307 |
Originally Posted by lancer
Seem quite average. What's the response time?
Also that's quite a small resolution for a widescreen panel, what size is it ?
Originally Posted by pokerblogger
He's asking about widescreen, not 4:3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #4 |
|
Godlike!
Joined: February 2004
Location: Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 7,015
Blog Entries: 5
Reputation: 4137
Power: 209 |
It's still better to have 1200+ pixels in screen height
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #5 |
|
There is no answer!
Joined: October 2004
Location: FL, USA
Posts: 3,087
Blog Entries: 3
Reputation: 1430
Power: 134 |
it was a 17" widescreen i believe. it was a cheap one n newegg, didn't specify the response time.
So as a gamer wanting a widescreen lcd, what specs should i be looking for? Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #6 |
|
OSNN Addict
Joined: June 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 125
Reputation: 90
Power: 71 |
I would suggest using the following as a guide:
1.) Low reponse time (<= 6ms) 2.) High Contrast Ratio 3.) High Brightness 4.) As high of a resolution as your graphics card can handle 5.) DVI Why do you want a widescreen? You can get a better gaming monitor in 4:3 . . . |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #7 |
|
There is no answer!
Joined: October 2004
Location: FL, USA
Posts: 3,087
Blog Entries: 3
Reputation: 1430
Power: 134 |
I think gaming in widescreen is a better experience.
but thanks for the advice. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #8 |
|
█▄█ ▀█▄ █
Joined: April 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 16,949
Reputation: 4941
Power: 302 |
IMO, 6ms for response time is a bit overkill. The human eye can't really differentiate much less than a 12-16ms response time, and the difference between that range and 6ms in cost I believe is substantial.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #9 |
|
There is no answer!
Joined: October 2004
Location: FL, USA
Posts: 3,087
Blog Entries: 3
Reputation: 1430
Power: 134 |
this is interesting news, can anyone else corroborate this?
Thanks kc |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #10 |
|
I may actually be insane.
Joined: March 2002
Location: Midlands, England
Posts: 15,800
Reputation: 2877
Power: 307 |
6ms is way overkill for the average person. I'd highly recommend finding the oldest, slowest LCD you can and playing a game on it. I've happily used LCDs with over 30ms response time and noticed nothing that would put me off using it again.
Most LCD's thse days offer a nice time under or equal to 16ms though, so it's not a lot to worry about, I only enquired regarding the response time to see if you were going to be getting a relatively new panel or not. Also, on Widescreen gaming, I refuse to even use a 4:3 these days. Widescreen is most definitely the future
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #11 |
|
There is no answer!
Joined: October 2004
Location: FL, USA
Posts: 3,087
Blog Entries: 3
Reputation: 1430
Power: 134 |
thats my thinking speedy, plus matts desktops are just to god damn awesome....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #12 |
|
The One and Only
Joined: August 2002
Location: Lehighton, PA
Posts: 3,160
Blog Entries: 3
Reputation: 1095
Power: 157 |
yeah.... widescreen certainly is MUCH different. i went from a 17" LCD to a 21" HD Widescreen LCD..... and usually 20 and 21 inch widescreens are considered a 17" monitor that's been stretched..... but my god is it huge compared to the last monitor.
how much are you looking to spend on a monitor? that'd give us a better idea of what to suggest. my widescreen cost me $600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #13 |
|
There is no answer!
Joined: October 2004
Location: FL, USA
Posts: 3,087
Blog Entries: 3
Reputation: 1430
Power: 134 |
i'm being cheap looking at $300 max, maybe more in a fit of carelessness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #14 |
|
I may actually be insane.
Joined: March 2002
Location: Midlands, England
Posts: 15,800
Reputation: 2877
Power: 307 |
Haven't dell got any offerings at/under the $300 range? (With all their coupon deals)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #15 |
|
█▄█ ▀█▄ █
Joined: April 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 16,949
Reputation: 4941
Power: 302 |
I've got the 2405FPW, and it's amazing
I know that is a bit above your price-range, but as someone who has used widescreen and non-widescreen, definitely go with widescreen, you won't regret it
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #16 |
|
█▄█ ▀█▄ █
Joined: April 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 16,949
Reputation: 4941
Power: 302 |
Another thing to keep in mind as well is how much web-browsing/word processing you do. I know the Widescreen look is all the rage (I love it), but if you primarily browse the web or work on documents, you'll start to miss the extra vertical resolution from a standard aspect display. Similar to why books are taller than they are wide, your eye can only track so far across a line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #17 |
|
F@H - Is it in you?
Joined: April 2002
Location: Between Austin and Tampa
Posts: 14,880
Reputation: 4110
Power: 309 |
Elaborated..
And yes, I am drunk out of my mind as I will be all weekend: D But its elaborated. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #18 |
|
Electronica Addict
Joined: February 2002
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 10,574
Reputation: 2960
Power: 257 |
[quote=kcnychief;730794 but if you primarily browse the web or work on documents, you'll start to miss the extra vertical resolution from a standard aspect display. Similar to why books are taller than they are wide, your eye can only track so far across a line.[/quote]
Well you can look at two pages instead of one though
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #19 |
|
I may actually be insane.
Joined: March 2002
Location: Midlands, England
Posts: 15,800
Reputation: 2877
Power: 307 |
Precisely, and if height is really that much of an issue, then you either buy the biggest screen you can get, or just twist the damned thing round so you've got an uner-tall screen rather than wide
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #20 |
|
The One and Only
Joined: August 2002
Location: Lehighton, PA
Posts: 3,160
Blog Entries: 3
Reputation: 1095
Power: 157 |
speedy's right about that. especially the "uner"-tall part. lol. my god do widescreen LCD's look freaky as all holy hell when they're in portrait mode. makes it seem like your LCD just got an instant upgrade.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Widescreen 19" | sindustrial777 | General Hardware | 15 | March 27th, 2006 5:18pm |
| Widescreen posts | Sazar | Site Problems & Feedback | 12 | March 20th, 2006 10:23pm |
| Widescreen wps...cellshaded ones? | apu95 | Graphic Design | 0 | April 22nd, 2005 5:40pm |
| WideScreen Wallpaper? | NathanA | Windows Desktop Systems | 6 | March 19th, 2005 7:54am |
| Widescreen | Funkyb | Graphics Cards | 5 | May 9th, 2004 2:01pm |