|
|
![]() |
|
|
Top | #1 |
|
The One and Only
Joined: August 2002
Location: Lehighton, PA
Posts: 3,160
Blog Entries: 3
Reputation: 1095
Power: 161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #2 |
|
Overclocked Like A Mother
Joined: July 2002
Location: In front of my computer
Posts: 2,729
Reputation: 684
Power: 154 |
No E,
It means that 2 x 400mghz DDR (DualDataRate) pipelines(channels) will be enabled from the cpu. Heeter |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #3 |
|
OSNN Advanced
Joined: June 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 4,252
Reputation: 1160
Power: 162 |
Yup, dual channel of double data rate (DDR) memory for you.
Acts like a highway with two lanes of traffic instead of just the single one. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #4 |
|
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: January 2003
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 5,261
Reputation: 3386
Power: 199 |
Mostly yes. I think there is an FSB bandwidth bottle neck that keeps them from getting all the way to "6400".
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #5 |
|
The One and Only
Joined: August 2002
Location: Lehighton, PA
Posts: 3,160
Blog Entries: 3
Reputation: 1095
Power: 161 |
well... that's kinda the way the dude at the comp show phrased it. having 2 sticks of PC3200, it would practically be running at 800MHz instead of 400MHz, which is kinda the same thing u just said. it's 2 sticks of ram running on separate channels, which means it can transfer data 2 times faster. i dunno. makes sense in my head. If you look at the pdf file in the attachment, it even shows u all the benchmark differences and stuff between running PC3200 DDR on Single Channel, and on Dual Channel. and at the one part, for Single Channel it shows the peak memory bandwidth is 3,200KB/s (being the 3200 part), and for Dual Channel, it shows the peak memory bandwidth as 6,400KB/s (following above rule, would be PC6400). either way... it's a drastic increase in speed over Single Channel DDR, or in my case, a single stick of what i guess would be PC133 SDRAM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #6 |
|
Ska Daddy
Joined: December 2001
Posts: 676
Reputation: 20
Power: 134 |
actually, usually the way it ends up working out on nForce 2 motherboards, is it gives one channel to the Video, and the other to the CPU.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #7 |
|
The Analog Kid
Joined: March 2002
Location: Red Sox Nation
Posts: 4,653
Reputation: 1111
Power: 182 |
only if you have on board video
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #8 |
|
The One and Only
Joined: August 2002
Location: Lehighton, PA
Posts: 3,160
Blog Entries: 3
Reputation: 1095
Power: 161 |
which my mobo does not. GigaByte 8IK1100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #9 |
|
F@H - Is it in you?
Joined: April 2002
Location: Between Austin and Tampa
Posts: 14,888
Reputation: 4110
Power: 313 |
the only time you are really noticing dual channel is likely to be with the FX lineup from amd or the intel p4 canterwood lineup...
they have the best implementation with noticeable difference in bandwidth limited situations... you just have more AVAILABLE bandwidth... your fsb is not changed in anyway.. ergo yes... throughput is better now... all the bandwidth gains are EXPECTED.. they are not the actual gains therefore you are unlikely to see them other than in synthetic situations for the most part or highly memory intensive situations as some professional software and office software calls for... |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #10 |
|
OSNN Junior Addict
Joined: January 2004
Posts: 3
Reputation: 0
Power: 0 |
technically... 200mhz(ddr400) in two channels, works at an eefective 800mhz(2 x 200x2 = 800 theoretical) also, your sending 128bit blocks of data, rather then 64 bit chunks as with single channel...
assuming your using a 800mhz bused p4, you would get a very efficant system bus... the same if your usin a 64 fx i think we all said exactly the same thing like 10 times, but, i wanted to say it to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #11 |
|
The One and Only
Joined: August 2002
Location: Lehighton, PA
Posts: 3,160
Blog Entries: 3
Reputation: 1095
Power: 161 |
lol. u kinda had a typo. DDR400 operates at 400mhz, not 200mhz. (hence the 400)
and the processor i'm runnin is a P4 2.4 GHz w/ HT |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #12 |
|
OSNN Senior Addict
Joined: August 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa, USA
Posts: 268
Reputation: 0
Power: 122 |
no, DDR400 runs at 200x2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #13 |
|
The One and Only
Joined: August 2002
Location: Lehighton, PA
Posts: 3,160
Blog Entries: 3
Reputation: 1095
Power: 161 |
same difference
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #14 |
|
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: January 2002
Location: Brossard,Quebec
Posts: 4,199
Blog Entries: 1
Reputation: 1481
Power: 182 |
And you do see a big difference in whatever you do when you use the duel channel I have tested mine in single channel and duel channel mode and no matter what you use when you set it to duel channel and match the fsb/ram ratio to 1:1 or 100% it screams speed .... I run faster than a 3200+ in both read and write with my setup
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #15 |
|
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: January 2002
Location: Brossard,Quebec
Posts: 4,199
Blog Entries: 1
Reputation: 1481
Power: 182 |
Originally Posted by blinden
And an intel P4 runs at 200Mhz to but go figure they say 800Mhz front bus thats some wacky math eh
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #16 |
|
Ska Daddy
Joined: December 2001
Posts: 676
Reputation: 20
Power: 134 |
It's 200 X 4
They Quad Pump their bus... |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #17 |
|
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: January 2002
Location: Brossard,Quebec
Posts: 4,199
Blog Entries: 1
Reputation: 1481
Power: 182 |
Yes I know but that dont mean much just look at the new cpu they are putting out .. its less performing , takes more power I have my doubts about intel seems they are on the wrong track ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #18 |
|
Gojyone kawaiiiiiiii!
Joined: March 2002
Posts: 820
Reputation: 190
Power: 134 |
i have a question. I have an Asus A7N8X which supports dual channel. I currently have a 512 stick of pc2700 and 2x256 sticks of pc2400. I'm not sure whats going on if dual channel is being used or what. Any recommendations on how to configure my ram optimally? i.e just use the 2 x 2400 sticks or just the 2700...or would you recommend getting new ram altogether? and what is the optimal Ram rating now? pc3000?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #19 |
|
The One and Only
Joined: August 2002
Location: Lehighton, PA
Posts: 3,160
Blog Entries: 3
Reputation: 1095
Power: 161 |
If your mobo can support it, it's up to 3200. you could buy 2 new sticks of 256MB of whatever DDR your mobo supports to get the best out of the RAM. If not, then i'd say use the 2 sticks of 256
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #20 |
|
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: January 2002
Location: Brossard,Quebec
Posts: 4,199
Blog Entries: 1
Reputation: 1481
Power: 182 |
if you set the ram to a speed = the the lower stick and run it #1 and #3 the same and the odd one out in #2 it should work in dual channel at the speed of the lower sticks , I have 2 dual channel MOBO's one MSI and one GIGABYTE both use 3 stick of ram in dual channel mode , MSI = #1=128mb #2=256mb #3=128 for a total = 512mb in dual
GIGABYTE is #1=256mb #2=512mb #=256 total = 1Gig Dual channel Too see if the dual channel is enabled there are a few programs that can read that info cpuz , and also the Nvidia utilities here I attached cpuz |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question about dual channel performance! | genji1 | Benchmarks & Performance | 1 | January 16th, 2007 5:29am |
| Dual Channel Memory | lad_in_brum | General Hardware | 2 | April 30th, 2005 2:04pm |
| NForce2 Dual Channel Ram Question | Heeter | General Hardware | 8 | May 29th, 2004 10:28pm |
| dual channel ram | Kush | General Hardware | 7 | April 11th, 2004 8:27pm |
| dual channel DDR | silky62678 | General Hardware | 17 | May 21st, 2003 9:08am |