|
|
![]() |
|
|
Top | #1 |
|
OSNN Junior Addict
Joined: June 2004
Posts: 3
Reputation: 0
Power: 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #2 |
|
OSNN Godlike Veteran
Joined: January 2002
Location: new york
Posts: 12,258
Reputation: 4333
Power: 291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #3 |
|
The Analog Kid
Joined: March 2002
Location: Red Sox Nation
Posts: 4,653
Reputation: 1111
Power: 182 |
perris to the rescue!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #4 |
|
The Last High
Joined: December 2001
Location: London
Posts: 18,510
Blog Entries: 51
Reputation: 3652
Power: 349 |
Bottom line: The more ram you have the bigger your virtual memory will/should be!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #5 |
|
Beware the G-Man
Joined: March 2002
Location: XP-erience, NTFS, OSNN, Bay Area, California
Posts: 18,474
Reputation: 4070
Power: 348 |
And the more memory that Windozz will want.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #6 |
|
OSNN Godlike Veteran
Joined: January 2002
Location: new york
Posts: 12,258
Reputation: 4333
Power: 291 |
Originally Posted by gonaads
which is the very reason that windozz is faster when you add more ram even if you haven't increased your workload
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Virtual memory | brocher | Windows Desktop Systems | 7 | March 31st, 2003 11:35pm |
| Low virtual memory? | Swi | Windows Desktop Systems | 3 | August 29th, 2002 4:27pm |
| virtual memory | spudnickle | Windows Desktop Systems | 15 | May 6th, 2002 8:19am |
| Virtual Memory Bug? | Eproxus | Windows Desktop Systems | 4 | April 21st, 2002 9:10pm |
| Virtual memory | hverduyckt | Windows Desktop Systems | 1 | March 21st, 2002 8:15pm |