Reply
Old July 12th, 2003 Top | #1
silky62678
 
silky62678's Avatar
Unregistered
Posts: n/a

Default Western Digital Caviar or Maxtor DiamondMax

Which drive is better per performance and speed?

Western Digital Caviar WD1200BB 120GB ATA/100 7200RPM Hard Drive ***(Free 2nd Day)***

Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 6Y120P0 120GB Ultra ATA/133 7200RPM Hard Drive w/8MB Buffer ***(Free 2nd Day)***

Both are around the same price
  Reply With Quote
Old July 12th, 2003 Top | #2
Polypeptide
 
Polypeptide's Avatar
Unregistered
Posts: n/a

Default

I can't say anything about the performance of the maxtor, but I have that western digital drive, and it's extremely fast, quite, and extremely reliable. I love it. Just thought I'd give my two cents.
  Reply With Quote
Old July 12th, 2003 Top | #3
 
Teddy's Avatar
Boogie Nights...!
Joined: July 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,551
Reputation: 70
Power: 133

Default

The Maxtor will give better performance due to the 8mb buffer.

Saying that, WD also do 'special edition' versions that also have this.

Love like you've never been hurt.
Work like you don't need the money.
Dance like no one is watching!
Teddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 12th, 2003 Top | #4
silky62678
 
silky62678's Avatar
Unregistered
Posts: n/a

Default

Yeah this is a WD special with 8mb buffer
I think the Maxtor would be better cause it has ATA 133 transfer and the WD has ATA100, but still want to get other opions
  Reply With Quote
Old July 12th, 2003 Top | #5
Sparsely
 
Sparsely's Avatar
Unregistered
Posts: n/a

Default

find out how loud each one is also (xDB). The specs should tell you access times
like 9ms or whatever too.
If your motherboard supports ATA133 I would get that drive.
They've all got some size buffer. You might have to look closely at
the specs to find it.
BTW are you looking at Googlegear?
  Reply With Quote
Old July 12th, 2003 Top | #6
 
LeeJend's Avatar
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: January 2003
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 5,255
Reputation: 3386
Power: 196

Default

I saw a lot of posts a few months back from people who had their over 100 gig WD drives die early and sudden deaths.

Go for the maxtor.

Thought for the new millenium:

In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates?

- Open Office - Firefox - Thunderbird - Gimp -Ubuntu - Red Hat -
LeeJend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 12th, 2003 Top | #7
silky62678
 
silky62678's Avatar
Unregistered
Posts: n/a

Default

Originally posted by Sparsely
find out how loud each one is also (xDB). The specs should tell you access times
like 9ms or whatever too.
If your motherboard supports ATA133 I would get that drive.
They've all got some size buffer. You might have to look closely at
the specs to find it.
BTW are you looking at Googlegear?
Yes that is the infamous "Googlegear". The maxtor say it has "quiet technology", but the WD has tools that will keep it from dying.
  Reply With Quote
Old July 12th, 2003 Top | #8
 
Petros's Avatar
Thief IV
Joined: May 2003
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,038
Reputation: 1647
Power: 153

Default

My 80GB WD with an 8MB cache just died on me! It must be the new design, so I'll be a little forgiving while the bugs get worked out Yes, I have two other hard drives and they give a three year warranty, but I'd rather not be without it for six weeks.
Petros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 12th, 2003 Top | #9
 
Goatman's Avatar
Ska Daddy
Joined: December 2001
Posts: 676
Reputation: 20
Power: 131

Default

Go the WD all the way. I work at a computer store, and we have dropped Maxtor, we have had more than half of the Maxtors we sold in the last two months go bad, we're replacing them with WDs.

THe WD is also known as one of the fastest drive out right now.... go for it.

The ATA100 vs. ATA133 is a moot arguement. The truth is they barely saturate the ATA100 standard. ATA133 is just a PR campaign to sell more drives. In reality the WD is the faster drive.
Goatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 12th, 2003 Top | #10
 
Goatman's Avatar
Ska Daddy
Joined: December 2001
Posts: 676
Reputation: 20
Power: 131

Default

According to the websites:

WD seek time is 8.9 ms
Maxtor seek time is 9.3 ms

the WD is much faster....
Goatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 12th, 2003 Top | #11

OSNN Folding Team  
Zedric's Avatar
NTFS Guru
Joined: January 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,006
Reputation: 890
Power: 171

Cool

Originally posted by silky62678
Yeah this is a WD special with 8mb buffer
Really? Isn't that called WD1200JB and not BB? Not that it matters as long as it's the right one.

I have the same disk and I just got it back from it's second replacement.
Go for the Maxtor I say.


Did I help you? Please use the reputation system. Click the icon on the left!
Proud host of the OSNN.net folding sigs. Want one? Check the folding thread!
http://zedric.no-ip.com/
Zedric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 13th, 2003 Top | #12
silky62678
 
silky62678's Avatar
Unregistered
Posts: n/a

Default

Does anyone know if the WD as quiet as the Maxtor ?
Maxtor is stating to be the quietest.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale: Western Digital Caviar SE 80GB SATA Hard Drive - $40.00 madmatt Garage Sale 0 December 26th, 2006 10:11pm
Western digital 15% off zeke_mo General Hardware 1 March 26th, 2005 5:23pm
maxtor or western digital? Kush General Hardware 30 February 26th, 2004 6:12am
Maxtor Diamondmax Plus 9 opinions sy64004 General Hardware 7 November 4th, 2003 9:36pm
western digital or samsung? canadian_divx General Hardware 6 March 15th, 2003 7:43am