Reply
Old February 15th, 2004 Top | #1
 
Kush's Avatar
High On Life!
Joined: January 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,590
Reputation: 1300
Power: 185

Default maxtor or western digital?

im probably ganna buy a 300 gb hard drive soon, but i now believe that maxtor is better than western digital. what do you guys think which is better the new maxtor drives? or the new western digital?
Kush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2004 Top | #2
 
Henyman's Avatar
Secret Goat Fetish
Joined: June 2002
Location: Dorset, England Posts: More Than You
Posts: 9,602
Reputation: 3548
Power: 253

Default

i am planing to get a new maxtor very soon never has any problems with em.
Henyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2004 Top | #3
 
dreamliner77's Avatar
The Analog Kid
Joined: March 2002
Location: Red Sox Nation
Posts: 4,653
Reputation: 1111
Power: 182

Default

If you plan on using it just for storage, i recommend the 300 gig 5400 rpm Maxtor.

"You can fight without ever winning, but never win without a fight." -Neil Peart of RUSH

dreamliner77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2004 Top | #4
 
Henyman's Avatar
Secret Goat Fetish
Joined: June 2002
Location: Dorset, England Posts: More Than You
Posts: 9,602
Reputation: 3548
Power: 253

Default

why only 5400? surely a 7200 is better + much faster
Henyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2004 Top | #5
 
Kush's Avatar
High On Life!
Joined: January 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,590
Reputation: 1300
Power: 185

Default

hahaha HELL No its not ganna be just for storage! high speed everything, just think of it as i want a ferrari to be running the pc
Kush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2004 Top | #6

OSNN Folding Team  
Electronic Punk's Avatar
The Last High
Joined: December 2001
Location: London
Posts: 18,510
Blog Entries: 51
Reputation: 3652
Power: 349

Default

hence for storage...

Electronic Punk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2004 Top | #7
 
Kush's Avatar
High On Life!
Joined: January 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,590
Reputation: 1300
Power: 185

Default

then what isnt for storage? what do u mean server etc...
Kush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2004 Top | #8
 
dreamliner77's Avatar
The Analog Kid
Joined: March 2002
Location: Red Sox Nation
Posts: 4,653
Reputation: 1111
Power: 182

Default

IE, not the drive your OS and apps are on. The lifespan of a 5400 RPM drive will be much longer.

"You can fight without ever winning, but never win without a fight." -Neil Peart of RUSH

dreamliner77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2004 Top | #9
 
Goatman's Avatar
Ska Daddy
Joined: December 2001
Posts: 676
Reputation: 20
Power: 134

Default

I say go WD.they are faster, and more reliable.
Goatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2004 Top | #10
 
dubstar's Avatar
format c:
Joined: December 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,358
Reputation: 50
Power: 129

Default

WD. storage = 5400rpm, 2mb cache,... active=sata or 7200, 8mb cache

QuistPro: 13" macbook pro. mid 2009. 10.6.4

box360: xbox 360 elite

apple airport extreme / fios / 10mb/2mb

retired:

nerdBox: a7n8x-d / xp pro / 2800 athlon xp

quistBox: xbox 1.6b / 250g / xenium ice mod-chip

quistServ: dell pEdge 600sc / 2k3

blackthorne: dell e1505 / mce / 1.83 duo

iQuist: White 3g iPhone / 16g / jailbroken / unlocked TMobile

quistMobile: tmobile mda

quistMobile2: htc g1
dubstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2004 Top | #11
 
Teddy's Avatar
Boogie Nights...!
Joined: July 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,551
Reputation: 70
Power: 136

Default

Originally Posted by Goatman
I say go WD.they are faster, and more reliable.
Personally i've had nothing but trouble with WD. Wouldnt ever go back to them after moving over to Seagate.

Maxtor.

Love like you've never been hurt.
Work like you don't need the money.
Dance like no one is watching!
Teddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2004 Top | #12
 
leedogg's Avatar
Gojyone kawaiiiiiiii!
Joined: March 2002
Posts: 820
Reputation: 190
Power: 134

Default

Whichever you can get for cheapest. WD, Maxtor, IBM, Hitachi, Seagate....all made by the same factory in Taiwan
leedogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2004 Top | #13
Xie

OSNN Subscriber
OSNN Folding Team  
Xie's Avatar
- geek -
Joined: September 2003
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 5,224
Reputation: 1730
Power: 175

Default

asking this question is same as asking AMD or Intel ... your never gonna get 100% either way .. its all personal choice

tehgeek | tehgeek | geeking out to tech | IRC | *Parted Magic* | A+ Certified Professional

Xie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2004 Top | #14
 
Goatman's Avatar
Ska Daddy
Joined: December 2001
Posts: 676
Reputation: 20
Power: 134

Default

at the computer store I worked at in the summer, the only drives we ever had to RMA were Maxtors.
Goatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 17th, 2004 Top | #15
 
toretto's Avatar
Mentally Absent
Joined: February 2004
Location: Mankato, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 226
Reputation: 70
Power: 103

Default

Originally Posted by leedogg
Whichever you can get for cheapest. WD, Maxtor, IBM, Hitachi, Seagate....all made by the same factory in Taiwan

there happens to be a seagate factory in minnesota, they just so happen to make hard drives there.

Most Used:
Genuine Intel(R) D850GB system board
Windows* 2000 version 5.0 Service Pack 4 build 2195
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1700MHz
Bus Speed 400 MHz
L1: Data Cache 8KB, Execution Trace Cache 12K Micro-ops
L2: Advanced Transfer Cache 256 KB
1,024 MB Kingston PC800 Rambus Memory
Ati Radeon 9800 256
1 120gb WD
2 80gb WD HD's striped
Sony Dual Layer DVD burner

<----Did anything I Said help you at all... please share the love and click the reputation icon.
toretto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 17th, 2004 Top | #16
 
toretto's Avatar
Mentally Absent
Joined: February 2004
Location: Mankato, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 226
Reputation: 70
Power: 103

Default

Personally, i entrust my data to Western Digital, i have had a seagate, it sucked, and maxtor which i have also owned is slower, but as you say, dependable. you say that you have sata, if that is what your running, what i am about to type doesnt apply. but if you put a 5400 rpm 2mb buffer HD on the same bus as a 7200rpm, 8mb buffer, you will cause the better and faster drive to slow down in its times. if anything. just keep them on oppisite busses. but your running sata, so ide wont matter.

Most Used:
Genuine Intel(R) D850GB system board
Windows* 2000 version 5.0 Service Pack 4 build 2195
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1700MHz
Bus Speed 400 MHz
L1: Data Cache 8KB, Execution Trace Cache 12K Micro-ops
L2: Advanced Transfer Cache 256 KB
1,024 MB Kingston PC800 Rambus Memory
Ati Radeon 9800 256
1 120gb WD
2 80gb WD HD's striped
Sony Dual Layer DVD burner

<----Did anything I Said help you at all... please share the love and click the reputation icon.
toretto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 17th, 2004 Top | #17
 
dreamliner77's Avatar
The Analog Kid
Joined: March 2002
Location: Red Sox Nation
Posts: 4,653
Reputation: 1111
Power: 182

Default

Toretto -

What you said above is only true on older windows OS's. XP can set DMA speed independently, not sure about 2K...

"You can fight without ever winning, but never win without a fight." -Neil Peart of RUSH

dreamliner77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 20th, 2004 Top | #18
 
toretto's Avatar
Mentally Absent
Joined: February 2004
Location: Mankato, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 226
Reputation: 70
Power: 103

Default

Originally Posted by dreamliner77
Toretto -

What you said above is only true on older windows OS's. XP can set DMA speed independently, not sure about 2K...
so apparently xp can, but can the motherboard, i guess i dont know enough to know that.

Most Used:
Genuine Intel(R) D850GB system board
Windows* 2000 version 5.0 Service Pack 4 build 2195
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1700MHz
Bus Speed 400 MHz
L1: Data Cache 8KB, Execution Trace Cache 12K Micro-ops
L2: Advanced Transfer Cache 256 KB
1,024 MB Kingston PC800 Rambus Memory
Ati Radeon 9800 256
1 120gb WD
2 80gb WD HD's striped
Sony Dual Layer DVD burner

<----Did anything I Said help you at all... please share the love and click the reputation icon.
toretto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 20th, 2004 Top | #19
 
chastity's Avatar
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: July 2002
Location: Arizona near the Grand Canyon
Posts: 2,107
Reputation: 613
Power: 147

Default

I've had good luck with Western Digital drives and Maxtor's though I think the WD are a little quieter compared to the Maxtor's based on what I've heard in my own use of them. To be honest as is the case with AMD or Intel no matter who you go with you should get a good drive as most of the answers are what people have dealt with while thats good to know about the issues not always the best way to make your decision on
chastity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 20th, 2004 Top | #20
 
RagnaroK's Avatar
Must be dreaming...
Joined: April 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 673
Reputation: 20
Power: 129

Default

Some like Seagate (me being one of them), while others like Western Digital and Maxtor, and I don't know if anyone likes Hitachi, but I've seen them around.
It's all personal choice as everyone else has been saying. Choose the drives brands you like and trust. If you still don't know what to choose... randomly pick.
RagnaroK is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Western digital 15% off zeke_mo General Hardware 1 March 26th, 2005 4:23pm
Western Digital Caviar or Maxtor DiamondMax silky62678 General Hardware 11 July 13th, 2003 9:55pm
western digital or samsung? canadian_divx General Hardware 6 March 15th, 2003 6:43am
Western Digital SUCKS paul_43 General Hardware 66 September 20th, 2002 1:09am
120GB Western Digital HDD Capacity Gouk General Hardware 9 June 26th, 2002 6:12am