|
|
![]() |
|
|
Top | #21 |
|
OSNN Senior Addict
Joined: January 2004
Location: The far side of nowhere
Posts: 573
Reputation: 585
Power: 112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #22 |
|
OSNN Designer
Joined: July 2002
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 8,722
Blog Entries: 106
Reputation: 1386
Power: 221 |
I just defraged and I never thought it would actually make a difference. I have really only noticed one thing but its a big thing to me. When I open Firefox it usually take 10 to 30 seconds to open. It just opened within 2 seconds or so. WOW
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #23 |
|
OSNN Senior Addict
Joined: January 2004
Location: The far side of nowhere
Posts: 573
Reputation: 585
Power: 112 |
Originally Posted by Bman
Considering your system specs it is absolutely disgusting for it to take 10-30 seconds for Firefox to start.
![]() Of course defragmenting is beneficial and helps with system performance when done regularly!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| XP Install Restart Issue, Plus Driver Letter Issue | lancer | Windows Desktop Systems | 4 | February 20th, 2006 1:25am |
| 2D performance? | adamg | Graphics Cards | 1 | June 9th, 2003 2:05pm |
| ATA HD Performance | RobbieSan | General Hardware | 7 | May 10th, 2003 2:20am |
| Why bad performance??? | Leo154 | General Hardware | 9 | November 26th, 2002 11:29am |
| XP Performance Tip + Keep the GUI | surge | Site Problems & Feedback | 17 | May 31st, 2002 5:38pm |