Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks

**Electronic Punk** · January 18th, 2006

Building on 3DMark05 as a foundation, Futuremark improved the core 3D engine, adding more complex ShaderModel 2.0 tests, stunning High Dynamic Range (HDR) ShaderModel 3.0 tests, and overall enhanced the product with substantially higher polygonal counts expected to be found in games two years into the future. Even with the addition of HDR/ShaderModel 3.0 tests, 3DMark06 still enables ShaderModel 2.0 compliant graphics card owners to run most of the benchmark and get a fully comparable 3DMark score. With these demanding new DirectX 9 implementations, 3DMark06's four graphics tests measure performance of the most advanced hardware while showing visually the compelling advantages of these new shader types.

3DMark06 is the first product from Futuremark using the AGEIA(tm) PhysX software physics library in two very complex, game-like threaded CPU tests conceived to measure properly performances of single processor, multi-core and multiple processor systems in next generation of games. In addition to using real-time physics, both CPU tests also employ multi-threaded artificial intelligence algorithms. By combining the results of the two CPU tests and four graphics tests, 3DMark06 enables users to get a 3DMark score which reflects the overall gaming performance of their PC. Futuremark and their industry partners anticipate that CPU performance promises to be increasingly important in next generation PC games as new titles increase their use of artificial intelligence and complex physics and their reliance on multithreaded processing.

You can download 3DMark06 from this page

Please use my next thread as a template for your benchmarks.
Thanks.

**Electronic Punk** · January 18th, 2006

CPU: AMD AthlonFX57 @ 2.8ghz
Motherboard: Abit AN8SLI Fatal1ty Bios 1.9
Memory: 2x1024meg Corsair CAS2 DDR2
Video Card: 2xNVIDIA Geforce 7800 GTX 256mb, Forceware 83.21
Hard drives: Quad SATA Maxtor Diamond9's 640gig RAID array
Soundcard: Soundblaster X-Fi Fatal1ty

3DMark Results:
Date: 2006-01-18
3DMark Score: 6281
SM 2.0 Score: 3334
SM 3.0 Score: 3186
CPU Score: 1093

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=2538

**VenomXt** · January 18th, 2006

CPU: AMD Athlon 64 3500+ (Venice)
Motherboard: ASUS A8N SLI Delux
Memory:CORSAIR XMS 2GB (4 x 512MB)
Video Card: Leadtek 6800GT 256MB Forceware 8.1.9.5
Hard drives: Raptor WD 36.7GB (2x Running RAID 0 strip)
Soundcard: Audigy 2 7.1

3DMark Results:
Date: 2006-01-18
3DMark Score: 2332
SM 2.0 Score: 981
SM 3.0 Score: 899
CPU Score: 871

Damn am i low or do you just blow me away EP?

**Petros** · January 18th, 2006

Ha...he is running 2 GTXs in SLI. I'm going to test mine when I get off work. Mine will probably be ~3500-4500, from what I've seen.

CPU: AMD Athlon 64 3700+ (San Diego)
Motherboard: ASRock 939Dual-SATA2 Socket 939 ULi M1695
Memory:OCZ DDR-400 (2 x 1GB) @ 2-3-2-5, 1T
Video Card: EVGA 256MB 7800GT
Hard drives: 120GB, 160GB, 200GB.
Soundcard: Realtek thingy 7.1

3DMark Results:
Date: 2006-01-19
3DMark Score: 3590
SM 2.0 Score: 1644
SM 3.0 Score: 1627
CPU Score: 850

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=20751

**Electronic Punk** · January 18th, 2006

Don't forget to post links to Orb if you have them

**ElementalDragon** · January 19th, 2006

CPU: AMD Athlon 64 3700+ @ 2.2Ghz
MB: Asus A8N-SLi Premium
memory: 2x 512MB DDR400
video card: eVGA GeForce 7800GT CO
Hard drive: WD 1600GB SATA150
sound card: SB Audigy 2 ZS

3DMark results
date: 1/18/06
3DMark score: 3654
SM 2.0 score: 1656
SM 3.0 score: 1648
CPU score: 884

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8733

**VenomXt** · January 19th, 2006

i need a 7800 GT...

**Aprox** · January 19th, 2006

CPU: Athlon 64 4000 OC to 2.6ghz
Motherboard: Asus A8N-SLI Deluxe
Memory: 4x512 Corsair XMS 3200
Video Card: XFX 6800 GT OC to 410/1120
Hard-Drives: 74GB Raptor & 80 GB Seagate SATA
Soundcard: Creative X-Fi Music

3DMark Results:
Date: 2006-01-18
3DMark Score: 2566 3DMarks

SM 2.0 Score: 1078 Marks

SM 3.0 Score: 986 Marks

CPU Score: 996 Marks

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9965

Originally Posted by VenomXt

i need a 7800 GT...

I hear that one...

**ElementalDragon** · January 19th, 2006

yeah...... they're a nice bump in performance over 6800GT's..... or at least it seemed like one to me. i mean.... now, CoD2 can play with all the settings maxed (not including corpse count and stuff.... i don't think.... don't remember if i changed that or not) at a rather reasonable framerate..... sometimes dropping down to like 10fps... but that's still not that bad.

**Sazar** · January 19th, 2006

CPU: Athlon64 X2 4400 2.4ghz
Motherboard: Asus A8V Deluxe
Memory: 2 x 1 GB Corsair XMS Pro 3200
Video Card: AIW x800xt

3DMark Results:
Date: 2006-01-18
3DMark Score: 2085 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score: 1027 Marks
SM 3.0 Score: n/a Marks
CPU Score: 1576 Marks

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11145

Heh, big whoop for the CPU

**Steevo** · January 19th, 2006

I am downloading it right now.......

LoctOut · January 19th, 2006

CPU: AMD64 3700+ San Diego @ 2.51
Motherboard: Abit AN8SLI Fatal1ty
Memory: 2x512 OCZ 4400
Video Card: BFG 7800GTX OC @ 488/1.34 81.95 Driver
Hard drives: Maxtor 120 GB
Soundcard: On Board Sound

3DMark Results:
Date: 2006-01-18
3DMark Score: 4035
SM 2.0 Score: 1923
SM 3.0 Score: 1896
CPU Score : 859

Not bad considering I haven't tweaked out the Motherboard yet

**ElementalDragon** · January 19th, 2006

only a 400 point difference between your system and mine, LoctOut? and you even OC'd your CPU, have an OC'd 7800GTX, and 1GB more DDR than me, at a faster DDR speed....... something don't seem right there......

LoctOut · January 19th, 2006

ElementalDragon.... you are right. I retested with new numbers & drivers.

CPU: AMD64 3700+ San Diego @ 2.51
Motherboard: Abit AN8SLI Fatal1ty
Memory: 2x512 OCZ 4400
Video Card: BFG 7800GTX OC @ 502/1.33 82.12 Driver
Hard drives: Maxtor 120 GB
Soundcard: On Board Sound

3DMark Results:
Date: 2006-01-18
3DMark Score: 4208
SM 2.0 Score: 2068
SM 3.0 Score: 1998
CPU Score : 853

**Aprox** · January 19th, 2006

umm.... 42k? its a new record!

edit.. you fixed it

**LordOfLA** · January 19th, 2006

CPU: AMD Athlon64 3500+ @ 2.2ghz
Motherboard: Asus A8N SLi Premium
Memory: 2x Crucial 512MB 2x Crucial 256MB
Video Card: 1xNVIDIA Geforce 7800 GTX 256mb, Forceware 83.10
Hard drives: Seagate 200GB Sata, Quantum Fireball 20Gb
Soundcard: Soundblaster X-Fi Xtreme Music

3DMark Results:
Date: 2006-01-19
3DMark Score: 3875
SM 2.0 Score: 1833
SM 3.0 Score: 1814
CPU Score: 838

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=16644

Everything was at default settings for advanced version bar enabling all the extra tests.

**Electronic Punk** · January 19th, 2006

Is anyone finding that when they click on a compare URL it says they are not logged in?

Also if you have a problem running 3DMark, make sure you have installed the December update rollup for DirectX (worked for me):

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...DisplayLang=en

The same file is compatible with all of these operating systems:
Windows 2000; Windows 2000 Advanced Server; Windows 2000 Professional Edition ; Windows 2000 Server; Windows 2000 Service Pack 2; Windows 2000 Service Pack 3; Windows 2000 Service Pack 4; Windows 98; Windows 98 Second Edition; Windows Server 2003; Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition; Windows Server 2003, Enterprise x64 Edition; Windows Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition; Windows Small Business Server 2003 ; Windows XP; Windows XP 64-bit; Windows XP Home Edition ; Windows XP Media Center Edition; Windows XP Professional Edition ; Windows XP Service Pack 1; Windows XP Service Pack 2; Windows XP Starter Edition; Windows XP Tablet PC Edition

**LordOfLA** · January 19th, 2006

you have to login once with an active orb project then you'll be fine - I just tried it out and seen how much the fx57 pwns my 3500+

**Electronic Punk** · January 19th, 2006

I am logged in, but it seems to do it regardless, very strange.
Alot of X2 chips seem to be owning my FX57, but they could well be FX60 chips, strange, I didn't really do anything when I benched anyway - of course everything was stock and I didn't stop any services etc.

**Sazar** · January 19th, 2006

Dunno bout that. I am pwning your CPU and its hardly an FX-60.

I think the CPU tests are simply multi-threaded which is why there is a performance improvement with the dual-cores. Probably with P4's as well with HT.

January 18th, 2006	Top \| #1
Electronic Punk The Last High Joined: December 2001 Location: London Posts: 18,506 Blog Entries: 51 Reputation: 3652 Power: 346	Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks Building on 3DMark05 as a foundation, Futuremark improved the core 3D engine, adding more complex ShaderModel 2.0 tests, stunning High Dynamic Range (HDR) ShaderModel 3.0 tests, and overall enhanced the product with substantially higher polygonal counts expected to be found in games two years into the future. Even with the addition of HDR/ShaderModel 3.0 tests, 3DMark06 still enables ShaderModel 2.0 compliant graphics card owners to run most of the benchmark and get a fully comparable 3DMark score. With these demanding new DirectX 9 implementations, 3DMark06's four graphics tests measure performance of the most advanced hardware while showing visually the compelling advantages of these new shader types. 3DMark06 is the first product from Futuremark using the AGEIA(tm) PhysX software physics library in two very complex, game-like threaded CPU tests conceived to measure properly performances of single processor, multi-core and multiple processor systems in next generation of games. In addition to using real-time physics, both CPU tests also employ multi-threaded artificial intelligence algorithms. By combining the results of the two CPU tests and four graphics tests, 3DMark06 enables users to get a 3DMark score which reflects the overall gaming performance of their PC. Futuremark and their industry partners anticipate that CPU performance promises to be increasingly important in next generation PC games as new titles increase their use of artificial intelligence and complex physics and their reliance on multithreaded processing. You can download 3DMark06 from this page Please use my next thread as a template for your benchmarks. Thanks.

January 18th, 2006	Top \| #2
Electronic Punk The Last High Joined: December 2001 Location: London Posts: 18,506 Blog Entries: 51 Reputation: 3652 Power: 346	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks CPU: AMD AthlonFX57 @ 2.8ghz Motherboard: Abit AN8SLI Fatal1ty Bios 1.9 Memory: 2x1024meg Corsair CAS2 DDR2 Video Card: 2xNVIDIA Geforce 7800 GTX 256mb, Forceware 83.21 Hard drives: Quad SATA Maxtor Diamond9's 640gig RAID array Soundcard: Soundblaster X-Fi Fatal1ty 3DMark Results: Date: 2006-01-18 3DMark Score: 6281 SM 2.0 Score: 3334 SM 3.0 Score: 3186 CPU Score: 1093 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=2538

January 18th, 2006	Top \| #3
VenomXt Blame me for the RAZR's Joined: March 2004 Location: Houston, Texas Posts: 3,442 Reputation: 1240 Power: 143	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks CPU: AMD Athlon 64 3500+ (Venice) Motherboard: ASUS A8N SLI Delux Memory:CORSAIR XMS 2GB (4 x 512MB) Video Card: Leadtek 6800GT 256MB Forceware 8.1.9.5 Hard drives: Raptor WD 36.7GB (2x Running RAID 0 strip) Soundcard: Audigy 2 7.1 3DMark Results: Date: 2006-01-18 3DMark Score: 2332 SM 2.0 Score: 981 SM 3.0 Score: 899 CPU Score: 871 Damn am i low or do you just blow me away EP? www.venomxt.com

January 18th, 2006	Top \| #4
Petros Thief IV Joined: May 2003 Location: Pacific Northwest Posts: 3,038 Reputation: 1647 Power: 153	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks Ha...he is running 2 GTXs in SLI. I'm going to test mine when I get off work. Mine will probably be ~3500-4500, from what I've seen. CPU: AMD Athlon 64 3700+ (San Diego) Motherboard: ASRock 939Dual-SATA2 Socket 939 ULi M1695 Memory:OCZ DDR-400 (2 x 1GB) @ 2-3-2-5, 1T Video Card: EVGA 256MB 7800GT Hard drives: 120GB, 160GB, 200GB. Soundcard: Realtek thingy 7.1 3DMark Results: Date: 2006-01-19 3DMark Score: 3590 SM 2.0 Score: 1644 SM 3.0 Score: 1627 CPU Score: 850 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=20751

January 18th, 2006	Top \| #5
Electronic Punk The Last High Joined: December 2001 Location: London Posts: 18,506 Blog Entries: 51 Reputation: 3652 Power: 346	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks Don't forget to post links to Orb if you have them

Latest News Posts

Latest Forum Posts

Latest Member Blogs

January 19th, 2006	Top \| #6
ElementalDragon The One and Only Joined: August 2002 Location: Lehighton, PA Posts: 3,160 Blog Entries: 3 Reputation: 1095 Power: 157	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks CPU: AMD Athlon 64 3700+ @ 2.2Ghz MB: Asus A8N-SLi Premium memory: 2x 512MB DDR400 video card: eVGA GeForce 7800GT CO Hard drive: WD 1600GB SATA150 sound card: SB Audigy 2 ZS 3DMark results date: 1/18/06 3DMark score: 3654 SM 2.0 score: 1656 SM 3.0 score: 1648 CPU score: 884 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8733 Core 2 Quad Q9450 \| 4GB DDR2 800 \| Abit IP-35 Pro \| eVGA GTX 295+ I Love Windows 7! Has my post been helpful to you? If so, please click the to the left to add to my reputation.

January 19th, 2006	Top \| #7
VenomXt Blame me for the RAZR's Joined: March 2004 Location: Houston, Texas Posts: 3,442 Reputation: 1240 Power: 143	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks i need a 7800 GT... www.venomxt.com

January 19th, 2006	Top \| #8
Aprox OSNN Veteran Addict Joined: August 2004 Location: California, USA Posts: 2,735 Blog Entries: 1 Reputation: 2036 Power: 138	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks CPU: Athlon 64 4000 OC to 2.6ghz Motherboard: Asus A8N-SLI Deluxe Memory: 4x512 Corsair XMS 3200 Video Card: XFX 6800 GT OC to 410/1120 Hard-Drives: 74GB Raptor & 80 GB Seagate SATA Soundcard: Creative X-Fi Music 3DMark Results: Date: 2006-01-18 3DMark Score: 2566 3DMarks SM 2.0 Score: 1078 Marks SM 3.0 Score: 986 Marks CPU Score: 996 Marks http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9965 Originally Posted by VenomXt i need a 7800 GT... I hear that one...

January 19th, 2006	Top \| #9
ElementalDragon The One and Only Joined: August 2002 Location: Lehighton, PA Posts: 3,160 Blog Entries: 3 Reputation: 1095 Power: 157	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks yeah...... they're a nice bump in performance over 6800GT's..... or at least it seemed like one to me. i mean.... now, CoD2 can play with all the settings maxed (not including corpse count and stuff.... i don't think.... don't remember if i changed that or not) at a rather reasonable framerate..... sometimes dropping down to like 10fps... but that's still not that bad. Core 2 Quad Q9450 \| 4GB DDR2 800 \| Abit IP-35 Pro \| eVGA GTX 295+ I Love Windows 7! Has my post been helpful to you? If so, please click the to the left to add to my reputation.

January 19th, 2006	Top \| #10
Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Joined: April 2002 Location: Between Austin and Tampa Posts: 14,880 Reputation: 4110 Power: 309	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks CPU: Athlon64 X2 4400 2.4ghz Motherboard: Asus A8V Deluxe Memory: 2 x 1 GB Corsair XMS Pro 3200 Video Card: AIW x800xt 3DMark Results: Date: 2006-01-18 3DMark Score: 2085 3DMarks SM 2.0 Score: 1027 Marks SM 3.0 Score: n/a Marks CPU Score: 1576 Marks http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11145 Heh, big whoop for the CPU Help to find cures for Alzheimer's, Mad Cow (BSE), CJD, ALS, Huntington's, Parkinson's disease, and many Cancers. Folding@Home, is it in you?

January 19th, 2006	Top \| #11
Steevo Spammer representing. Joined: September 2004 Posts: 2,566 Blog Entries: 2 Reputation: 1630 Power: 132	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks I am downloading it right now....... Meow. Equal oppertunity hater.

January 19th, 2006	Top \| #12
LoctOut OSNN Addict Joined: August 2004 Posts: 65 Reputation: 50 Power: 92	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks CPU: AMD64 3700+ San Diego @ 2.51 Motherboard: Abit AN8SLI Fatal1ty Memory: 2x512 OCZ 4400 Video Card: BFG 7800GTX OC @ 488/1.34 81.95 Driver Hard drives: Maxtor 120 GB Soundcard: On Board Sound 3DMark Results: Date: 2006-01-18 3DMark Score: 4035 SM 2.0 Score: 1923 SM 3.0 Score: 1896 CPU Score : 859 Not bad considering I haven't tweaked out the Motherboard yet

January 19th, 2006	Top \| #13
ElementalDragon The One and Only Joined: August 2002 Location: Lehighton, PA Posts: 3,160 Blog Entries: 3 Reputation: 1095 Power: 157	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks only a 400 point difference between your system and mine, LoctOut? and you even OC'd your CPU, have an OC'd 7800GTX, and 1GB more DDR than me, at a faster DDR speed....... something don't seem right there...... Core 2 Quad Q9450 \| 4GB DDR2 800 \| Abit IP-35 Pro \| eVGA GTX 295+ I Love Windows 7! Has my post been helpful to you? If so, please click the to the left to add to my reputation.

January 19th, 2006	Top \| #14
LoctOut OSNN Addict Joined: August 2004 Posts: 65 Reputation: 50 Power: 92	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks ElementalDragon.... you are right. I retested with new numbers & drivers. CPU: AMD64 3700+ San Diego @ 2.51 Motherboard: Abit AN8SLI Fatal1ty Memory: 2x512 OCZ 4400 Video Card: BFG 7800GTX OC @ 502/1.33 82.12 Driver Hard drives: Maxtor 120 GB Soundcard: On Board Sound 3DMark Results: Date: 2006-01-18 3DMark Score: 4208 SM 2.0 Score: 2068 SM 3.0 Score: 1998 CPU Score : 853

January 19th, 2006	Top \| #15
Aprox OSNN Veteran Addict Joined: August 2004 Location: California, USA Posts: 2,735 Blog Entries: 1 Reputation: 2036 Power: 138	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks umm.... 42k? its a new record! edit.. you fixed it

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Futuremark's 3DMark03 Benchmarks	Electronic Punk	Benchmarks & Performance	9	April 26th, 2007 3:43am
Futuremark's 3DMark05 Benchmarks	Electronic Punk	Benchmarks & Performance	82	April 26th, 2007 3:41am
Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks	Electronic Punk	Benchmarks & Performance	19	May 16th, 2006 5:11pm
3DMark06 Benchmarks	ElementalDragon	Benchmarks & Performance	1	January 18th, 2006 8:38pm
Futuremark's PCMark 2004 Benchmarks	Electronic Punk	Benchmarks & Performance	2	June 19th, 2005 12:36pm

January 19th, 2006	Top \| #16
LordOfLA Godlike! Joined: February 2004 Location: Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK Posts: 7,015 Blog Entries: 5 Reputation: 4137 Power: 209	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks CPU: AMD Athlon64 3500+ @ 2.2ghz Motherboard: Asus A8N SLi Premium Memory: 2x Crucial 512MB 2x Crucial 256MB Video Card: 1xNVIDIA Geforce 7800 GTX 256mb, Forceware 83.10 Hard drives: Seagate 200GB Sata, Quantum Fireball 20Gb Soundcard: Soundblaster X-Fi Xtreme Music 3DMark Results: Date: 2006-01-19 3DMark Score: 3875 SM 2.0 Score: 1833 SM 3.0 Score: 1814 CPU Score: 838 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=16644 Everything was at default settings for advanced version bar enabling all the extra tests. If HK-47 and GLaDOS had a child, the character they create would cause the video game world to overdose on awesome. -sheridanmovieguy: Dragon age forum user.

January 19th, 2006	Top \| #17
Electronic Punk The Last High Joined: December 2001 Location: London Posts: 18,506 Blog Entries: 51 Reputation: 3652 Power: 346	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks Is anyone finding that when they click on a compare URL it says they are not logged in? Also if you have a problem running 3DMark, make sure you have installed the December update rollup for DirectX (worked for me): http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...DisplayLang=en The same file is compatible with all of these operating systems: Windows 2000; Windows 2000 Advanced Server; Windows 2000 Professional Edition ; Windows 2000 Server; Windows 2000 Service Pack 2; Windows 2000 Service Pack 3; Windows 2000 Service Pack 4; Windows 98; Windows 98 Second Edition; Windows Server 2003; Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition; Windows Server 2003, Enterprise x64 Edition; Windows Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition; Windows Small Business Server 2003 ; Windows XP; Windows XP 64-bit; Windows XP Home Edition ; Windows XP Media Center Edition; Windows XP Professional Edition ; Windows XP Service Pack 1; Windows XP Service Pack 2; Windows XP Starter Edition; Windows XP Tablet PC Edition

January 19th, 2006	Top \| #18
LordOfLA Godlike! Joined: February 2004 Location: Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK Posts: 7,015 Blog Entries: 5 Reputation: 4137 Power: 209	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks you have to login once with an active orb project then you'll be fine - I just tried it out and seen how much the fx57 pwns my 3500+ If HK-47 and GLaDOS had a child, the character they create would cause the video game world to overdose on awesome. -sheridanmovieguy: Dragon age forum user.

January 19th, 2006	Top \| #19
Electronic Punk The Last High Joined: December 2001 Location: London Posts: 18,506 Blog Entries: 51 Reputation: 3652 Power: 346	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks I am logged in, but it seems to do it regardless, very strange. Alot of X2 chips seem to be owning my FX57, but they could well be FX60 chips, strange, I didn't really do anything when I benched anyway - of course everything was stock and I didn't stop any services etc.

January 19th, 2006	Top \| #20
Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Joined: April 2002 Location: Between Austin and Tampa Posts: 14,880 Reputation: 4110 Power: 309	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks Dunno bout that. I am pwning your CPU and its hardly an FX-60. I think the CPU tests are simply multi-threaded which is why there is a performance improvement with the dual-cores. Probably with P4's as well with HT. Help to find cures for Alzheimer's, Mad Cow (BSE), CJD, ALS, Huntington's, Parkinson's disease, and many Cancers. Folding@Home, is it in you?