|
|
Member Login:
|
|
 |
June 28th, 2005
|
Last edited by Electronic Punk; June 29th, 2005 at 8:49am. | Top | #1 |
The Last High
Joined: December 2001
Location: Stonehenge
Posts: 18,902
Blog Entries: 49
Reputation: 3652
Power: 326 |
Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks
PCMark®05 is everything you need to reliably and easily measure the performance of your PC and determine its strengths and weaknesses. With PCMark05, you will be able to select the optimal upgrades for your existing PC, or choose the right new PC that fits your specific needs. This easy-to-use product gives you the same tools and knowledge that virtually every professional tester in the industry uses.
You can download PCMark 2005 from this page Please use my next thread as a template for your benchmarks. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28th, 2005
|
Top | #2 |
|
The Last High
Joined: December 2001
Location: Stonehenge
Posts: 18,902
Blog Entries: 49
Reputation: 3652
Power: 326 |
Re: Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks
CPU: AMD Athlon64 3400+ @ 2.2ghz
OS: WindowsXP x64 Edition Motherboard: MSI Neo FiS2R, Bios rev 2.2 Memory: 2x512meg Crucial CAS3 DDR Video Card: NVIDIA Geforce 6800 Ultra 256mb, Forceware 77.72 Hard drives: Dual SATA Maxtor Diamond9's 320gig RAID array Soundcard: Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS PCMark Results: Scores coming |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 29th, 2005
|
Top | #3 |
F@H - Is it in you?
Joined: April 2002
Location: Between Austin and Tampa
Posts: 14,941
Reputation: 4110
Power: 287 |
Re: Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks
Pcmark 2004 or 2005? Thread title is for 2005, your link claims for 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 29th, 2005
|
Top | #4 |
|
The Last High
Joined: December 2001
Location: Stonehenge
Posts: 18,902
Blog Entries: 49
Reputation: 3652
Power: 326 |
Re: Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks
It is almost as if I cut and paste it from the other thread!
Not had a chance to run this yet? Any cool test anyone? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 29th, 2005
|
Top | #5 |
OSNN Addict
Joined: January 2005
Posts: 180
Reputation: 130
Power: 66 |
Re: Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks
CPU: P4 3.8ghz
OS: WindowsXP Home Edition Memory: 2x512 DDR2 533MHz Video Card: NVIDIA Geforce 7800 GTX 256mb, Forceware 77.72 Hard drives: 74GB WD Raptor PCMark Results: 5118 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=4522 |
|
|
|
|
August 7th, 2005
|
Last edited by Slimfady; August 7th, 2005 at 2:01pm. | Top | #6 |
OSNN Dino Addcit
Joined: February 2004
Posts: 49
Reputation: 0
Power: 75 |
Re: Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks
Hey guys,
do you think that i'm ok with a 3269 score? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 7th, 2005
|
Top | #7 |
Spammer representing.
Joined: September 2004
Posts: 2,623
Blog Entries: 2
Reputation: 1630
Power: 110 |
Re: Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks
I keep getting a access violation during the sound and video part of the test. From the log file created it occurs when PCMARK05.exe tries to access vorbis.dll. I have tried a reboot so far and dropping OC'ing and checking drivers, they are all certified drivers.
It also seems to take awhile for the HDD tests and the program to initilize. I will try to re-install it and if that doesn't work then a new download and install. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 7th, 2005
|
Top | #8 |
|
F@H - Is it in you?
Joined: April 2002
Location: Between Austin and Tampa
Posts: 14,941
Reputation: 4110
Power: 287 |
Re: Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks
Are there any other apps you might need to install do you think steeve?
Some of the other FM tools require additional downloads, wondering if it is true for this as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 7th, 2005
|
Top | #9 |
|
Spammer representing.
Joined: September 2004
Posts: 2,623
Blog Entries: 2
Reputation: 1630
Power: 110 |
Re: Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks
Checked all specs, WMC9 was installed , but I re-installed it.
Un-installed PCMark05, downloaded from another source, verified the checksum. Re-installed same problem. Used Windows Codec Checker tool, all files are the most current. The only thing I can think of is if my onboard audio doesn't support the format. Then again, I dunno..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 8th, 2005
|
Top | #10 |
|
F@H - Is it in you?
Joined: April 2002
Location: Between Austin and Tampa
Posts: 14,941
Reputation: 4110
Power: 287 |
Re: Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks
I would have thought it would still run?
I'll give it a shot when I get my AIW x800xt this week. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 8th, 2005
|
Top | #11 |
|
The Last High
Joined: December 2001
Location: Stonehenge
Posts: 18,902
Blog Entries: 49
Reputation: 3652
Power: 326 |
Re: Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks
You are changing graphics cards more often than I do Sazar... well nearly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 8th, 2005
|
Top | #12 |
|
F@H - Is it in you?
Joined: April 2002
Location: Between Austin and Tampa
Posts: 14,941
Reputation: 4110
Power: 287 |
Re: Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks
Originally Posted by Electronic Punk
Not quite, still have the AIW 9700pro here
 Getting rid of the ultra since I just am not impressed. I won't be impressed with the x800xt either but since its an AIW, why the heck not eh  Tide me over for a few months till the next toys drop. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 8th, 2005
|
Top | #13 |
|
The Last High
Joined: December 2001
Location: Stonehenge
Posts: 18,902
Blog Entries: 49
Reputation: 3652
Power: 326 |
Re: Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks
Not impressed by the Ultra?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 8th, 2005
|
Last edited by Sazar; August 8th, 2005 at 2:18pm. | Top | #14 |
|
F@H - Is it in you?
Joined: April 2002
Location: Between Austin and Tampa
Posts: 14,941
Reputation: 4110
Power: 287 |
Re: Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks
Surprisingly, no.
There is no improvement in picture quality. Higher res with filtering, yes, but not impressive. The most impressed I have been was with the 9700pro, plus it was an AIW. I replayed every game I finished with my 9700pro on the ultra and I was not impressed. BF2 being the exception. I guess I am more of a stealth/strategy kinda guy than a run in and gun em all down fella. And I generally play cs  more than anything else and there is no advancement. The AIW x800xt should be a little faster in most things off the bat that I play.I am waiting for the next round to get the real wow factor. By that time I will have accumulated enough Amazon gift cards from work to buy an x2 as well 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 10th, 2005
|
Top | #15 |
|
OSNN Addict
Joined: January 2005
Posts: 180
Reputation: 130
Power: 66 |
Re: Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks
With a P4 670 CPU instead of the 570 that was installed when I ran the benchmarks in my post on June 29th my PCMark05 score went from 5118 to 5395. I like that extra MB of Line 2 cache that the 670 has!
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=65236 |
|
|
|
|
December 7th, 2005
|
Top | #16 |
OSNN Senior Addict
Joined: February 2005
Posts: 311
Reputation: 50
Power: 66 |
Re: Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks
does 2909 seem low for my hardware?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 7th, 2005
|
Top | #17 |
|
F@H - Is it in you?
Joined: April 2002
Location: Between Austin and Tampa
Posts: 14,941
Reputation: 4110
Power: 287 |
Re: Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks
Post a compare and also compare your system score v/s other system scores to check and see how comparable it really is.
Makes it easier for you when you are asking questions to receive answers that way. Fwiw, your scores in this and other threads seems to be about normal for your system. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 7th, 2005
|
Top | #18 |
|
OSNN Senior Addict
Joined: February 2005
Posts: 311
Reputation: 50
Power: 66 |
Re: Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks
alright thanx and what is a post a compare. i might not be able to compare mine to other systems because i just have the free version of the two progams
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 7th, 2005
|
Top | #19 |
|
F@H - Is it in you?
Joined: April 2002
Location: Between Austin and Tampa
Posts: 14,941
Reputation: 4110
Power: 287 |
Re: Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=191171
That is a compare. Your score you got, you have to publish it, select ACTIVE and PUBLISHED and update it so you can post the url. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16th, 2006
|
Top | #20 |
|
OSNN Junior Addict
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 17
Reputation: 0
Power: 47 |
Re: Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=365470
PCMark05: 5471 (results using single video) Does this number seem about right for my system? A vast improvement over the numbers I was getting a couple days ago. There isnt a lot of results in this thread to compare to. Only thing I dont understand is why it shows my core clock of my videocards as 8 Mhz. Its actually at stock speeds of 430 Mhz, mem clock is 1.2 Ghz and stock. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks | Electronic Punk | Benchmarks & Performance | 59 | June 22nd, 2008 4:32pm |
| Futuremark's 3DMark03 Benchmarks | Electronic Punk | Benchmarks & Performance | 9 | April 26th, 2007 2:43am |
| Futuremark's 3DMark05 Benchmarks | Electronic Punk | Benchmarks & Performance | 82 | April 26th, 2007 2:41am |
| Futuremark's PCMark 2004 Benchmarks | Electronic Punk | Benchmarks & Performance | 2 | June 19th, 2005 11:36am |
| Futuremark PCMark 2004 Benchmarks | Sazar | Benchmarks & Performance | 30 | August 2nd, 2004 9:36am |
 |
