Futuremark's 3DMark 2001 SE Benchmarks

**Electronic Punk** · December 29th, 2004

3DMark®2001 SE Pro (build 330) is the latest installment (hah! - punk) in the popular 3DMark series. By combining DirectX®8.1 support with completely new graphics, it continues to provide benchmark results that empower you to make informed hardware assessments. The game tests, texturing tests, filtering tests, image quality tests, and others give you an overview of your system’s current performance and show you what kind of performance you could expect if you were to upgrade your PC.

You can download 3DMark 2001 SE from this page

Please use my next thread as a template for your benchmarks.
Thanks.

**Electronic Punk** · December 29th, 2004

CPU: AMD Athlon64 3400+ @ 2.2ghz
Motherboard: MSI Neo FiS2R, Bios rev 1.8
Memory: 2x512meg Crucial CAS3 DDR
Video Card: NVIDIA Geforce 6800 Ultra 256mb, Forceware 61.77
Hard drives: Dual SATA Maxtor Diamond9's 320gig RAID array
Soundcard: Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS

3DMark Results:

Date: 2004-08-01
System Test: 23696 3DMarks

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8014559

**perris** · December 29th, 2004

btw ep

how do you like that amd 64?

**Electronic Punk** · December 29th, 2004

Very impressed with it.
Not only is it faster than my AthlonXP 3000+, its cooler (in both senses), was alot easier to install (can't really go wrong) but I also believe the power consumption is lower.

To say its cooler, if the temp goes above 40c I start to wonder whats wrong. Usually dances between 25 and 35. It would be lower, but my graphics card is doing a grand job of warming things up at 64c (case is therefore about 35-40c)

**perris** · December 29th, 2004

nice

**Sazar** · December 29th, 2004

he just doesn't use Cool 'n' Quiet much

seriously though its a very nice cpu and does run cooler than my old AXP processor...

toss-up in temps between my p4 C and this but with cnq running, its much cooler... and it doesn't heat up to as high a temp...

**Electronic Punk** · December 29th, 2004

I do use cool and quiet, the problem is that I don't have the stock fan anymore.
So at the expense of buying a watercooling system, its fast, cool and quiet

**Sazar** · December 29th, 2004

have you looked into the new 7700CU fan from zalman?

its pretty nice and uses a 120mm fan instead of the 92 with the older one

**Moonwraith** · December 29th, 2004

Quite rare to find a motherboard to fit it.. or at least my small knowledge of motherboards. Doesn't fit the Neo2 platinum

Got my 7000b-CU sitting here waiting for a motherboard. I'm not sure how much more weight/size a motherboard could take

**Sazar** · January 16th, 2005

CPU: AMD Athlon64 3400+ @ 2.2ghz
Motherboard: MSI Neo FiS2R, Bios rev 1.8
Memory: 2x512meg corsair XMS
Video Card: NVIDIA Geforce 6800 Ultra 256mb, Forceware 66.93
Hard drives: Dual SATA Maxtor Diamondmax 9's
Soundcard: Soundblaster Audigy

23068 3D marks

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8372818

**LeeJend** · January 18th, 2005

CPU: Barton 2500 W/FSB @ 182mhz, actual clock 2.1 mhz
Motherboard: ECS NF2000U
Memory: 768 meg 7,2,2,2.5 spektek (2) & micron (1), Clock at 182 FSB
Video Card: ATI RAdeon 9800 PRO, core 378 / memory 362, Catalyst 4.12
Hard drives: WD 120 gig 7200 RPM
Soundcard: SBlive

15877 3D marks, I feel so inadequate...

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8375281

It was interesting running 2001 again. The benchmark didn't go up much over this system using a 9500 Pro but graphics detail seems much more vivid, especially in the nature tests.

**Moonwraith** · January 20th, 2005

CPU: AMD AthlonXP 2200+
Motherboard: Asus A7v333
Memory: 2x512meg value select corsair PC2700
Video Card: NVIDIA Geforce Ti4200 64Mb
Soundcard: Soundblaster Audigy

9009 3D marks

Now who's inadequate?

**Henyman** · January 20th, 2005

i got 3143

intel pentium 4 2.8ghtz
896mb pc2700 ram
128mb modile radeon 9000

tommy · January 23rd, 2005

CPU: AMD Athlon64 3800+ @ 2.4ghz
Motherboard: Asus A8v Deluxe
Memory: 2x512meg corsair XMS XL PRO 2-2-2-5
Video Card: 9600 se

9939 3D Marks

tommy · January 23rd, 2005

CPU: AMD Athlon64 3800+ @ 2.4ghz
Motherboard: Asus A8v Deluxe
Memory: 2x512meg corsair XMS XL PRO 2-2-2-5
Video Card: NVIDIA Geforce 6800 Ultra 256mb 66.93

22949 3d Marks

**Electronic Punk** · January 23rd, 2005

Saz: Bios is up to v2 now

**Sazar** · January 23rd, 2005

any advantages?

I'll give it a decko

**Electronic Punk** · January 23rd, 2005

Over 1.8 perhaps....nothing major between 1.9 and 2.0 - supports some sempron or other

**Moonwraith** · January 26th, 2005

CPU: Athlon64 3500+ Winchester @ 2.2ghz
Mobo: MSI Neo2 Platinum
RAM: 2x512 Corsair XMS Twin-X CL2 Pro PC3200
GPU: BFG Geforce 6800 Ultra OC

Score: 22251

9009 to 22251 in a day
I'm quite happy

mikill · May 31st, 2005

do ya'll realize how bogus 3dmark is? i mean if u do extensive research on it, you will see how bogus it is. examples are higher end spec'd pc's are being beat by older lower end pc's. i mean c'mon, how can lower end machines beat higher end machines? biggest example is the game benchs. you see 9800pros beating 6800's in the game benches, but the 6800 beats the 9800pro in the other test, bump map, single/multi fill rates and so on. here is one comparison, http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5830983. how can a 9700 with only an AXP1800 beat my Barton core AXP3000 w/6800, keep in mind also my 6800 is unlocked 16/6. not the standard 12/5. my conclusion, 3dmrk is not reliable at any form. these test comparisons clearly show this. this link is not the only one either. there are many showing results like this.

December 29th, 2004	Top \| #1
Electronic Punk The Last High Joined: December 2001 Location: Stonehenge Posts: 18,902 Blog Entries: 49 Reputation: 3652 Power: 326	Futuremark's 3DMark 2001 SE Benchmarks 3DMark®2001 SE Pro (build 330) is the latest installment (hah! - punk) in the popular 3DMark series. By combining DirectX®8.1 support with completely new graphics, it continues to provide benchmark results that empower you to make informed hardware assessments. The game tests, texturing tests, filtering tests, image quality tests, and others give you an overview of your system’s current performance and show you what kind of performance you could expect if you were to upgrade your PC. You can download 3DMark 2001 SE from this page Please use my next thread as a template for your benchmarks. Thanks.

December 29th, 2004	Top \| #3
perris OSNN Godlike Veteran Joined: January 2002 Location: new york Posts: 12,043 Reputation: 4333 Power: 263	btw ep how do you like that amd 64?
	LIFE IS NOT A DESTINATION, IT'S A JOURNEY

December 29th, 2004	Top \| #5
perris OSNN Godlike Veteran Joined: January 2002 Location: new york Posts: 12,043 Reputation: 4333 Power: 263	nice
	LIFE IS NOT A DESTINATION, IT'S A JOURNEY

December 29th, 2004	Top \| #6
Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Joined: April 2002 Location: Between Austin and Tampa Posts: 14,941 Reputation: 4110 Power: 287	he just doesn't use Cool 'n' Quiet much seriously though its a very nice cpu and does run cooler than my old AXP processor... toss-up in temps between my p4 C and this but with cnq running, its much cooler... and it doesn't heat up to as high a temp...
	Media Server: Intel Q9450 \| 8GB Corsair XMS2 \| 4870 1GB \| 1.5 TB Storage \| Logitech G-15/G-9 \| Windows 7 Ultimate x64 HTPC: AMD 4400+ \| 2GB Corsair \| 2 TB Storage \| 8800 GTS (G92) \| Logitech Edge \| Hauppauge 1600 \| Windows 7 Ultimate x86 Notebook Dell E6400 \| Core2Duo 8400 \| 4GB \| Encrypted 160GB with FFS \| WXGA+ LED \| Quadro NVS 160 \| Windows 7 Enterprise x64 Folding @ Home \| XBL / PSN / Steam : SAZARIUS \| Zune Social : SAZAR99

December 29th, 2004	Top \| #8
Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Joined: April 2002 Location: Between Austin and Tampa Posts: 14,941 Reputation: 4110 Power: 287	have you looked into the new 7700CU fan from zalman? its pretty nice and uses a 120mm fan instead of the 92 with the older one
	Media Server: Intel Q9450 \| 8GB Corsair XMS2 \| 4870 1GB \| 1.5 TB Storage \| Logitech G-15/G-9 \| Windows 7 Ultimate x64 HTPC: AMD 4400+ \| 2GB Corsair \| 2 TB Storage \| 8800 GTS (G92) \| Logitech Edge \| Hauppauge 1600 \| Windows 7 Ultimate x86 Notebook Dell E6400 \| Core2Duo 8400 \| 4GB \| Encrypted 160GB with FFS \| WXGA+ LED \| Quadro NVS 160 \| Windows 7 Enterprise x64 Folding @ Home \| XBL / PSN / Steam : SAZARIUS \| Zune Social : SAZAR99

Latest News Posts

Latest Forum Posts

Latest Member Blogs

December 29th, 2004	Top \| #2
Electronic Punk The Last High Joined: December 2001 Location: Stonehenge Posts: 18,902 Blog Entries: 49 Reputation: 3652 Power: 326	CPU: AMD Athlon64 3400+ @ 2.2ghz Motherboard: MSI Neo FiS2R, Bios rev 1.8 Memory: 2x512meg Crucial CAS3 DDR Video Card: NVIDIA Geforce 6800 Ultra 256mb, Forceware 61.77 Hard drives: Dual SATA Maxtor Diamond9's 320gig RAID array Soundcard: Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS 3DMark Results: Date: 2004-08-01 System Test: 23696 3DMarks http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8014559

December 29th, 2004	Top \| #4
Electronic Punk The Last High Joined: December 2001 Location: Stonehenge Posts: 18,902 Blog Entries: 49 Reputation: 3652 Power: 326	Very impressed with it. Not only is it faster than my AthlonXP 3000+, its cooler (in both senses), was alot easier to install (can't really go wrong) but I also believe the power consumption is lower. To say its cooler, if the temp goes above 40c I start to wonder whats wrong. Usually dances between 25 and 35. It would be lower, but my graphics card is doing a grand job of warming things up at 64c (case is therefore about 35-40c)

December 29th, 2004	Top \| #7
Electronic Punk The Last High Joined: December 2001 Location: Stonehenge Posts: 18,902 Blog Entries: 49 Reputation: 3652 Power: 326	I do use cool and quiet, the problem is that I don't have the stock fan anymore. So at the expense of buying a watercooling system, its fast, cool and quiet

December 29th, 2004	Top \| #9
Moonwraith OSNN Veteran Addict Joined: October 2004 Location: UK Posts: 1,130 Reputation: 320 Power: 80	Quite rare to find a motherboard to fit it.. or at least my small knowledge of motherboards. Doesn't fit the Neo2 platinum Got my 7000b-CU sitting here waiting for a motherboard. I'm not sure how much more weight/size a motherboard could take
	Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 -- Asus Rampage Formula BFG GeForce 280 GTX OCX -- 4GB Corsair XMS2 Dominator

January 16th, 2005	Top \| #10
Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Joined: April 2002 Location: Between Austin and Tampa Posts: 14,941 Reputation: 4110 Power: 287	CPU: AMD Athlon64 3400+ @ 2.2ghz Motherboard: MSI Neo FiS2R, Bios rev 1.8 Memory: 2x512meg corsair XMS Video Card: NVIDIA Geforce 6800 Ultra 256mb, Forceware 66.93 Hard drives: Dual SATA Maxtor Diamondmax 9's Soundcard: Soundblaster Audigy 23068 3D marks http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8372818
	Media Server: Intel Q9450 \| 8GB Corsair XMS2 \| 4870 1GB \| 1.5 TB Storage \| Logitech G-15/G-9 \| Windows 7 Ultimate x64 HTPC: AMD 4400+ \| 2GB Corsair \| 2 TB Storage \| 8800 GTS (G92) \| Logitech Edge \| Hauppauge 1600 \| Windows 7 Ultimate x86 Notebook Dell E6400 \| Core2Duo 8400 \| 4GB \| Encrypted 160GB with FFS \| WXGA+ LED \| Quadro NVS 160 \| Windows 7 Enterprise x64 Folding @ Home \| XBL / PSN / Steam : SAZARIUS \| Zune Social : SAZAR99

January 18th, 2005	Top \| #11
LeeJend OSNN Veteran Addict Joined: January 2003 Location: Fort Worth, TX Posts: 5,192 Reputation: 2950 Power: 168	CPU: Barton 2500 W/FSB @ 182mhz, actual clock 2.1 mhz Motherboard: ECS NF2000U Memory: 768 meg 7,2,2,2.5 spektek (2) & micron (1), Clock at 182 FSB Video Card: ATI RAdeon 9800 PRO, core 378 / memory 362, Catalyst 4.12 Hard drives: WD 120 gig 7200 RPM Soundcard: SBlive 15877 3D marks, I feel so inadequate... http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8375281 It was interesting running 2001 again. The benchmark didn't go up much over this system using a 9500 Pro but graphics detail seems much more vivid, especially in the nature tests.
	Thought for the new millenium: In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates? - Open Office - Firefox - Thunderbird - Gimp -Ubuntu - Red Hat -

January 20th, 2005	Top \| #12
Moonwraith OSNN Veteran Addict Joined: October 2004 Location: UK Posts: 1,130 Reputation: 320 Power: 80	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark 2001 SE Benchmarks CPU: AMD AthlonXP 2200+ Motherboard: Asus A7v333 Memory: 2x512meg value select corsair PC2700 Video Card: NVIDIA Geforce Ti4200 64Mb Soundcard: Soundblaster Audigy 9009 3D marks Now who's inadequate?
	Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 -- Asus Rampage Formula BFG GeForce 280 GTX OCX -- 4GB Corsair XMS2 Dominator

January 20th, 2005	Top \| #13
Henyman Secret Goat Fetish Joined: June 2002 Location: Dorset, England Posts: More Than You Posts: 9,588 Reputation: 3548 Power: 225	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark 2001 SE Benchmarks i got 3143 intel pentium 4 2.8ghtz 896mb pc2700 ram 128mb modile radeon 9000
	http://Henyman.com

January 23rd, 2005	Top \| #14
tommy OSNN Member Joined: January 2004 Location: Salisbury. England Posts: 189 Reputation: 30 Power: 77	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark 2001 SE Benchmarks CPU: AMD Athlon64 3800+ @ 2.4ghz Motherboard: Asus A8v Deluxe Memory: 2x512meg corsair XMS XL PRO 2-2-2-5 Video Card: 9600 se 9939 3D Marks

January 23rd, 2005	Top \| #15
tommy OSNN Member Joined: January 2004 Location: Salisbury. England Posts: 189 Reputation: 30 Power: 77	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark 2001 SE Benchmarks CPU: AMD Athlon64 3800+ @ 2.4ghz Motherboard: Asus A8v Deluxe Memory: 2x512meg corsair XMS XL PRO 2-2-2-5 Video Card: NVIDIA Geforce 6800 Ultra 256mb 66.93 22949 3d Marks

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Futuremark's 3DMark06 Benchmarks	Electronic Punk	Benchmarks & Performance	59	June 22nd, 2008 4:32pm
Futuremark's 3DMark03 Benchmarks	Electronic Punk	Benchmarks & Performance	9	April 26th, 2007 2:43am
Futuremark's 3DMark05 Benchmarks	Electronic Punk	Benchmarks & Performance	82	April 26th, 2007 2:41am
Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks	Electronic Punk	Benchmarks & Performance	19	May 16th, 2006 4:11pm
Futuremark's PCMark 2004 Benchmarks	Electronic Punk	Benchmarks & Performance	2	June 19th, 2005 11:36am

January 23rd, 2005	Top \| #16
Electronic Punk The Last High Joined: December 2001 Location: Stonehenge Posts: 18,902 Blog Entries: 49 Reputation: 3652 Power: 326	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark 2001 SE Benchmarks Saz: Bios is up to v2 now

January 23rd, 2005	Top \| #17
Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Joined: April 2002 Location: Between Austin and Tampa Posts: 14,941 Reputation: 4110 Power: 287	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark 2001 SE Benchmarks any advantages? I'll give it a decko
	Media Server: Intel Q9450 \| 8GB Corsair XMS2 \| 4870 1GB \| 1.5 TB Storage \| Logitech G-15/G-9 \| Windows 7 Ultimate x64 HTPC: AMD 4400+ \| 2GB Corsair \| 2 TB Storage \| 8800 GTS (G92) \| Logitech Edge \| Hauppauge 1600 \| Windows 7 Ultimate x86 Notebook Dell E6400 \| Core2Duo 8400 \| 4GB \| Encrypted 160GB with FFS \| WXGA+ LED \| Quadro NVS 160 \| Windows 7 Enterprise x64 Folding @ Home \| XBL / PSN / Steam : SAZARIUS \| Zune Social : SAZAR99

January 23rd, 2005	Top \| #18
Electronic Punk The Last High Joined: December 2001 Location: Stonehenge Posts: 18,902 Blog Entries: 49 Reputation: 3652 Power: 326	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark 2001 SE Benchmarks Over 1.8 perhaps....nothing major between 1.9 and 2.0 - supports some sempron or other

January 26th, 2005	Top \| #19
Moonwraith OSNN Veteran Addict Joined: October 2004 Location: UK Posts: 1,130 Reputation: 320 Power: 80	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark 2001 SE Benchmarks CPU: Athlon64 3500+ Winchester @ 2.2ghz Mobo: MSI Neo2 Platinum RAM: 2x512 Corsair XMS Twin-X CL2 Pro PC3200 GPU: BFG Geforce 6800 Ultra OC Score: 22251 9009 to 22251 in a day I'm quite happy
	Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 -- Asus Rampage Formula BFG GeForce 280 GTX OCX -- 4GB Corsair XMS2 Dominator

May 31st, 2005	Top \| #20
mikill _ Joined: December 2002 Posts: 115 Reputation: 0 Power: 90	Re: Futuremark's 3DMark 2001 SE Benchmarks do ya'll realize how bogus 3dmark is? i mean if u do extensive research on it, you will see how bogus it is. examples are higher end spec'd pc's are being beat by older lower end pc's. i mean c'mon, how can lower end machines beat higher end machines? biggest example is the game benchs. you see 9800pros beating 6800's in the game benches, but the 6800 beats the 9800pro in the other test, bump map, single/multi fill rates and so on. here is one comparison, http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5830983. how can a 9700 with only an AXP1800 beat my Barton core AXP3000 w/6800, keep in mind also my 6800 is unlocked 16/6. not the standard 12/5. my conclusion, 3dmrk is not reliable at any form. these test comparisons clearly show this. this link is not the only one either. there are many showing results like this.