|
|
![]() |
|
|
Top | #1 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
I have a AMD T-bird 1.33ghz 512 MB of DDR ram A 30 gig harddrive 19 inch monitor windows xp pro So anyone know whats wrong? I already did the refreshrate fix, using 29.42 drivers... vsync is off Can anyone help me out? |
|
|
|
Top | #2 |
|
F@H - Is it in you?
Joined: April 2002
Location: Between Austin and Tampa
Posts: 14,886
Reputation: 4110
Power: 312 |
your cpu might be the bottleneck..
I dunno other than that.. maybe you need to mess around with your bios a little and optimize your settings... I get a higher score than that with my card.. BUT I have a faster cpu... |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #3 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
I have seen other people with almost the same setup getting better scores...what kind of settings can i fix to make it better? And why can I only do the benchmark is d3d, isnt opengl better?
|
|
|
|
Top | #4 |
|
hardware monkey
Joined: May 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,206
Reputation: 90
Power: 155 |
3dmark2001 is a directx8.1 benchmarking program. for an opengl benchmark, you can try quake or something.
but you should be getting a much higher score. i get 4300 with my 100mhz fsb, sdram, and gf2. if i got a ti 4200, i estimate i'd get around 8500. that's about what you should get since you have ddr, a 133mhz system bus, but a (somewhat) slower processor than i. what kind of score did you get with your previous card? it might be something in your bios. are you familiar with all of the bios options? |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #5 |
|
F@H - Is it in you?
Joined: April 2002
Location: Between Austin and Tampa
Posts: 14,886
Reputation: 4110
Power: 312 |
dunno bout 8500 with a 1.3 gig rig... perhaps around 8000 is more like it...
the overall performance of your system is slower than it should be... ensure that the bios has the correct speed setting for your cpu and that when you benchmark you dont have a bunch of files open in the background taking up resources... just a coupla things will slow down your gpu and lower your score... try looking around your bios... btw do not drop your CAS for memory to below 2.5 I don't recommend it...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #6 |
|
hardware monkey
Joined: May 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,206
Reputation: 90
Power: 155 |
why not? cas 2 gives me a couple hundred points over cas 3.
also, when i said 8500, i was assuming after overclocking the video card. }:> 7500-8000 is more reasonable without. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #7 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
Can anyone give me site with exactly what I should do in the bios?
Also my old vid card, a geforce 2 gts, got about the same I belive. Oh and I have an ASUS A7A266 motherboard. |
|
|
|
Top | #8 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
Okay, I just reformatted my computer, anyone know where I can find a step by step guide on what to do to get the best performance out of my computer? Like which drivers, which to install first, what bios settings I should have and so on?
Thanks |
|
|
|
Top | #9 |
|
hardware monkey
Joined: May 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,206
Reputation: 90
Power: 155 |
just get the latest nvidia drivers. might as well get the latest via 4in1 drivers, but they won't affect your 3d performance.
www.nvidia.com www.viaarena.com after that, see what score you get. if it's still low, the problem is most liekly in your bios and we'll go from there. btw, what score did you get with your gts? |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #10 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
Here is what I have:
Operating System Microsoft Windows XP DirectX Version 8.1 Mobo Manufacturer ASUSTeK Computer INC. Mobo Model A7A266 AGP Rates (Current/Available) 4x / 1x 2x 4x CPU AMD Athlon(tm) Processor 1345 MHz FSB 133 MHz Memory 512 MB Graphics Chipset NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 Driver Name NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 Driver Version 6.13.10.3082 Video Memory 128 MB Program Version 3DMark2001 SE Resolution 1024x768 32bit Texture Format Compressed FSAA Disabled Z-Buffer Depth 24bit Frame Buffer Double Rendering Pipeline D3D Pure Hardware T&L 3DMark Score 5979 3D marks Game 1 Car Chase - Low Detail 90.6 FPS Game 1 Car Chase - High Detail 33.7 FPS Game 2 Dragothic - Low Detail 107.6 FPS Game 2 Dragothic - High Detail 58.7 FPS Game 3 Lobby - Low Detail 89.9 FPS Game 3 Lobby - High Detail 41.8 FPS Game 4 Nature 20.8 FPS Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 811.7 MTexels/s Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 1851.5 MTexels/s High Polygon Count (1 light) 21.2 MTriangels/s High Polygon Count (8 lights) 10.4 MTriangels/s Environment Bump Mapping 85.0 FPS DOT3 Bump Mapping 105.4 FPS Vertex Shader 12.1 FPS Pixel Shader 70.1 FPS Advanced Pixel Shader 38.8 FPS Point Sprite 22.7 MSprites/s Didn't install the 4in1 yet though. With my gts I think it was around the same. Maybe a tiny drop less if any. What should I do in my bios? Already set the AGP thingy to half my memory(so 256) dont know what else to do though. |
|
|
|
Top | #12 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
This is what i can think of:
1. It might just be the card, is it an oem or retail card? 2. Are you running anything in the backround??? 3. In bios are u using UC or USWC video cache mode? dunno if this might help... I use USWC 4. How fast is your hard-drive??? does 3dmark run smoothly or does it spike when it reads off hard-disk. 5. try switching around your ram, though I really really dought this is the problem... Thats all i can think of right now, BTW: i'm still using a TNT2 Ultra video card |
|
|
|
Top | #13 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
It is retail, nothing in background that I know of, in bios is UC, dont know how fast my hd is, but it doesnt spike or anything.
|
|
|
|
Top | #14 |
|
F@H - Is it in you?
Joined: April 2002
Location: Between Austin and Tampa
Posts: 14,886
Reputation: 4110
Power: 312 |
what you are going to look to do is possibly enable fast-write coz I think your board supports it... agp aperture size should be 128mb... um make sure you have NO background apps running so that it does not slow down the test..
default with your rig as is... a score of 8000 is EXPECTED... 5000 is a little low... your settings look ok... make sure you have the proper drivers... I dunno on an asus board things should work out just fine... if things look nutty try putting the card in a friends rig and testing the scores there... also try out your PCmark2002 test and see what cpu score and others you get.. coz that might also show you what the bottle neck is.. I am posting my scores... not to brag.. but so you can compare yours... my 3dmark2001 is http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4244102 my pcmark2002 scores are cpu = 5137 memory = 3685 HDD = 870 |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #15 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
I have fast write enabled already, damn it, always my luck that things don't work the way they are supposed to, what should I do next, call gainward?
|
|
|
|
Top | #16 |
|
F@H - Is it in you?
Joined: April 2002
Location: Between Austin and Tampa
Posts: 14,886
Reputation: 4110
Power: 312 |
try the card elsewhere... maybe there is a setting or something that is not working some place..
run pcmark2002 from madonion to see if memory/hdd is bottleneck... just run it and post the scores |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #17 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
CPU score: 3589
Memory score: 3161 HDD score: 845 http://service.madonion.com/servlet/...ojectId=602473 This mean my cpu is too crappy for some strange reason, even though people with around the same cpu have better benchmarks then me...? Also what would be my best bet for upgrades for a new mb and chip? Price range around 200-300 dollars. |
|
|
|
Top | #20 |
|
F@H - Is it in you?
Joined: April 2002
Location: Between Austin and Tampa
Posts: 14,886
Reputation: 4110
Power: 312 |
jack... see if you can post a thinger with a compare instead of the URL of the screen you are seeing...
just go to online project browser and go to project manager... you will see a compare link for your active projects... just post that... your cpu is as fast as a mate of mine.. he has a 1.4ghz... and his card is a little less powerfull... think the 64mb 4200... and he gets around 8000... and you have more memory than him... I can't see the bottleneck.. the pcmark scores are pretty decent... if you are to upgrade... do the mobo upgrade... look for 333mhz compatible boards... like the via kt333 ![]() in asus terms that would be the a7v333 board... |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Prime95 Benchmark Athlon64 AMD 4200,4400 or 4800 | Rokks | Benchmarks & Performance | 5 | November 4th, 2006 3:40pm |
| Geforce4 Ti 4200 and Geforce FX 5600 ... confusing.. | Nedreplan | Graphics Cards | 7 | July 15th, 2003 1:40am |
| Nvidia GeForce4 Ti 4200 | ElementalDragon | Graphics Cards | 7 | November 14th, 2002 9:43pm |
| 4200 128mb: aopen, evga, prolink | Taurus | Graphics Cards | 9 | October 24th, 2002 12:41pm |
| overclocking a g4 ti 4200 128mb | wyrlwyn | General Hardware | 2 | September 11th, 2002 5:46am |