|
Member Login:
|
|
 |
February 6th, 2004
|
Top | #21 |
aka prodj88 =P
Joined: July 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 2,401
Reputation: 730
Power: 152 |
|
|
|
Button To The Left Can Be Used To Reward Members For Good Posts|
February 9th, 2004
|
Top | #22 |
Tomorrow Tweaking Today
Joined: May 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,516
Reputation: 240
Power: 127 |
3867
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=187416 Just changed Video card to 9600XT. But got slower RAID with HDDs with only 2MB cache instead of 8MB. Could everyone post system specs or publish results so we can make a sensible comparison...please 
|
|
|
|
|
February 13th, 2004
|
Top | #23 |
hardware monkey
Joined: May 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,206
Reputation: 90
Power: 155 |
WinXP Home SP1
Athlon XP 2500+ Barton @ 10.5x200 = 2.1GHz Abit NF7 2.0 (forceware 3.13) 2x512MB cheap PC3200 @ 400MHz, 7-3-3-2.5 ATI Radeon 9800PRO 128MB @ stock 3798 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=195525 |
|
|
|
|
February 13th, 2004
|
Top | #24 |
|
Tomorrow Tweaking Today
Joined: May 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,516
Reputation: 240
Power: 127 |
Good thing your 9800 gave you an energy boost
|
|
|
|
|
February 14th, 2004
|
Top | #25 |
|
hardware monkey
Joined: May 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,206
Reputation: 90
Power: 155 |
Originally Posted by coathanger007
hmm, not so sure that 9800 helped much in this one. this run is right after i got a 2.0 board installed so i'm able to do a 400fsb now. i think that's the reason for the ~250 extra points.
btw, why did you disable ht? |
|
|
|
|
February 14th, 2004
|
Top | #26 |
|
Tomorrow Tweaking Today
Joined: May 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,516
Reputation: 240
Power: 127 |
My processor doesn't support HT
I doubt it would make much of a differnece anyway as a benchmark is just a single big program.
|
|
|
|
|
February 14th, 2004
|
Top | #27 |
|
hardware monkey
Joined: May 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,206
Reputation: 90
Power: 155 |
i'm sure it would make a difference. after all, aren't all the "multithreaded" tests meant to take advantage of hyperthreading?
|
|
|
|
|
February 14th, 2004
|
Top | #28 |
|
Tomorrow Tweaking Today
Joined: May 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,516
Reputation: 240
Power: 127 |
Oops...forgot this was a PCmark04 thread. Thought we were talking about 3Dmark03
|
|
|
|
|
May 15th, 2004
|
Top | #29 |
The Last High
Joined: December 2001
Location: London
Posts: 18,510
Blog Entries: 51
Reputation: 3652
Power: 349 |
|
|
|
|
|
June 18th, 2004
|
Top | #30 |
Smokeater
Joined: June 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 314
Reputation: 10
Power: 125 |
Im rather disappointed, I only got 3165 on my brand new computer
|
|
|
|
|
August 2nd, 2004
|
Top | #31 |
|
The Last High
Joined: December 2001
Location: London
Posts: 18,510
Blog Entries: 51
Reputation: 3652
Power: 349 |
The graphics tests kept freezing on a few of the tests (not a complete lcokup resumed not long afterwards ] - but enough to reduce my score.
So I will wait until I have had a word with Nvidia
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ran pcmark... A few questions. | a dreams forever | General Hardware | 6 | September 13th, 2007 5:26am |
| Futuremark's PCMark 2005 Benchmarks | Electronic Punk | Benchmarks & Performance | 19 | May 16th, 2006 4:11pm |
| Futuremark's PCMark 2004 Benchmarks | Electronic Punk | Benchmarks & Performance | 2 | June 19th, 2005 11:36am |
| old Futuremark 3DMark2001 SE Benchmarks | anewhope | Benchmarks & Performance | 473 | September 26th, 2004 1:30am |
| old Futuremark 3DMark03 Benchmarks | leencaci | Benchmarks & Performance | 40 | September 3rd, 2004 2:54am |
